Hi-Fella Insights

Philippines 2025 Elections: Implications for Foreign Investors and Trade Policies

In May 2025, the Philippines will hold its midterm elections—a political event that may not grab global headlines like presidential races, but one that carries significant weight for foreign investors, trade partners, and supply chain operators who rely on Southeast Asia’s rising economies.

Midterm elections in the Philippines serve as a referendum on the current administration’s performance, shaping the legislative agenda for the next three years. For businesses with exposure in the archipelago—whether through manufacturing bases, service centres, infrastructure investments, or export-import corridors—understanding the 2025 elections isn’t just a political curiosity. It’s an operational imperative.

Why the 2025 Midterm Elections Matter

The 2025 elections will decide 12 of the 24 Senate seats, all 316 seats in the House of Representatives, and thousands of local government positions across provinces, cities, and municipalities. This vote will determine whether the Marcos Jr. administration can continue pushing its economic and trade reforms—or whether it will hit legislative resistance.

As of 2024, President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. has focused on infrastructure development under the “Build Better More” program, increased engagement with the US and Japan, revived interest in renewable energy and mining, and introduced select reforms to liberalise foreign investment rules.

A midterm victory would cement the political capital required to push through complex reforms, such as amending restrictive economic provisions in the 1987 Constitution or upgrading the country’s lagging logistics infrastructure. On the flip side, a loss in the Senate or a fragmented House majority could dilute investor confidence, freeze regulatory clarity, and slow legislative momentum.

Track Record: The Philippines Under Marcos Jr. (2022–2025)

So far, the Marcos administration has taken a mixed but generally pragmatic approach to economic governance. Key achievements relevant to foreign investors include:

  • Public Service Act amendments: The opening of key sectors such as telecommunications, transportation, and railways to 100% foreign ownership (Republic Act No. 11659) was a landmark reform carried over from the Duterte era and implemented more aggressively under Marcos Jr.
  • MAF (Manufacturing, Agribusiness, Fisheries) focus: The administration has promoted investment in agro-industrial zones and downstream processing to reduce reliance on raw exports and increase domestic value-add.
  • Renewable energy liberalisation: In 2022, the Department of Energy removed foreign ownership limits for renewable energy projects (excluding nuclear), inviting Japanese, Korean, and European players into solar, wind, and geothermal development.
  • Improved ties with the West: While the previous administration leaned heavily on China, the Marcos Jr. government has balanced ties with both the US and Japan. In 2023, the Philippines joined Indo-Pacific trade and investment frameworks such as the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) and reinforced defence-economic cooperation through the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA).

Yet, key bottlenecks remain:

  • Persistent red tape and bureaucratic inertia
  • Weak logistics connectivity between islands
  • Skills mismatch in emerging sectors like high-tech manufacturing
  • Ambiguity around fiscal incentives under the Corporate Recovery and Tax Incentives for Enterprises (CREATE) Act

Trade Policy Outlook: Continuity or Course Correction?

Foreign investors watching the 2025 elections are essentially trying to answer this: will the post-election Philippines remain pro-trade, pro-market, and foreign-friendly?

As of now, the momentum leans toward continuity. The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) continues to push for greater participation in regional and global value chains. The Philippines remains a strong member of ASEAN and is committed to the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), the world’s largest trade bloc.

In fact, the Philippines ratified RCEP in 2023 after months of political hesitancy. This sends a clear signal that the country wants to attract manufacturing relocations from China and Vietnam, especially in electronics, garments, and agrifood sectors.

However, the extent to which RCEP benefits are realised depends on:

  • Post-election regulatory consistency
  • Local government support in industrial zones
  • Customs and trade facilitation reforms (Philippines ranks 113th in the World Bank’s 2023 Logistics Performance Index)

If nationalist or populist candidates gain power—especially in the Senate—it could slow down further liberalisation efforts or even trigger protectionist pushback in sensitive sectors like mining, agriculture, or foreign retail.

FDI Trends and What Investors Should Watch

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) inflows to the Philippines peaked in 2017–2018 at over USD 10 billion, then dipped during the pandemic. In 2023, the country saw USD 8.4 billion in net FDI inflows (Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas). The most active sectors included:

  • Manufacturing (electronics, automotive parts)
  • Real estate and construction
  • Financial services
  • Renewable energy

But concerns persist:

  • The Philippines lags behind peers like Vietnam and Indonesia in attracting supply chain relocations
  • Foreign investors cite high logistics costs (around 24% of total business expenses) and slow permitting processes as key deterrents
  • Tax incentives remain confusing post-CREATE, especially for new entrants vs. existing locators in PEZA (Philippine Economic Zone Authority)

Post-2025, we expect three FDI trends to accelerate—depending on election outcomes:

  1. China+1 strategy: Western and Japanese firms will continue shifting some operations from China. The Philippines could win deals in semiconductors, medical devices, and specialty chemicals if it improves ease of doing business.
  2. Green FDI: Renewable energy projects, e-vehicle component assembly, and smart agriculture systems will gain traction, especially under favorable LGU (local government unit) alignment.
  3. Digital services exports: BPO (business process outsourcing) and KPO (knowledge process outsourcing) remain strong. Post-election policy on remote work tax regimes and fibre infrastructure will be crucial here.

Key Sectors to Watch After 2025

Certain industries are more sensitive to post-election shifts in legislation, investor sentiment, or bureaucratic behaviour:

Mining and Natural Resources
Mining contributed around 1.1% to GDP in 2023, but accounts for 6% of exports and employs over 200,000 people. The Marcos administration lifted the ban on open-pit mining, sparking renewed foreign interest. But future Senate composition may influence:

  • Mining tax reforms
  • Environmental permit issuance
  • Local community relations and Indigenous People’s rights

Agribusiness and Food Imports
Expect tighter food trade regulations if agricultural protectionism rises post-election. Inflation concerns and food sovereignty rhetoric often dominate midterm platforms, which could affect:

  • Rice import quotas and tariff schedules
  • Animal feed and input supply chains
  • Export bans in extreme weather conditions

Transport Infrastructure
The “Build Better More” pipeline includes over 100 flagship projects, from airports and seaports to rail systems. Foreign EPC (Engineering, Procurement and Construction) players—especially from Korea and Japan—stand to benefit, but project continuity will depend on:

  • Legislative support for public-private partnerships (PPPs)
  • Fiscal space post-2025
  • Provincial election results that determine local cooperation

Digital and Tech
The Philippines remains a global BPO hub, but is now pushing into AI, fintech, and cybersecurity. Foreign VCs and digital service providers will watch for:

  • New digital tax regulations
  • Data localisation laws
  • Cybercrime and digital infrastructure legislation

Risks and Opportunities: What Should Export-Import Players Do?

For global trade and export-import players, the Philippines is an attractive but complex market. The 2025 elections can either enhance or disrupt this opportunity landscape.

Risks to Watch

  • Post-election uncertainty leading to policy inertia
  • Populist-led changes in trade or investment rules
  • Regulatory whiplash from shifting legislative majorities
  • Volatility in currency or fuel prices from global economic conditions and domestic political responses

Opportunities to Capture

  • Rising demand for intermediate goods as manufacturing ramps up post-RCEP
  • Strategic logistics partnerships with local firms to support archipelagic connectivity
  • Greater uptake of e-commerce platforms requiring cross-border fulfilment
  • First-mover advantage in renewable energy supply chain components (solar panels, battery storage, EV chargers)

Final Thought: Betting on Political Stability, but Preparing for Strategic Agility

The Philippines is no stranger to political change, but its economy has proven remarkably resilient. GDP growth is projected at 6% in 2025 by the ADB, inflation is moderating, and a young, English-speaking workforce continues to attract global firms.

That said, political risk must be embedded into every trade and investment strategy in the country. The 2025 elections will likely define the economic playing field until the 2028 presidential race.

Investors and exporters who stay close to political developments, build flexibility into their supply chains, and engage with local partners across all levels of government will be best positioned to navigate what’s next.

In Southeast Asia, agility is not optional—it’s a survival skill. And in the Philippines, it’s also the key to growth.

Join Hi-Fella Today!

As the Philippines heads toward its 2025 elections, shifts in trade policy and investor sentiment are inevitable — but for savvy export-import businesses, this also opens doors. Hi-Fella helps you stay ahead of the curve with up-to-date market intelligence, access to verified local partners, and tools to navigate changing regulations with confidence. 

Whether you’re eyeing new opportunities or safeguarding existing operations, Hi-Fella equips you to make informed decisions and build strong, compliant trade relationships in the evolving Philippine market. Now is the time to position your business smartly — and Hi-Fella is the partner to help you do it.

About Author

Zhafran Tsany

Zhafran Tsany

Leave a Reply

Other Article

The Intersection of Religion and International Business: Understanding Pope Leo's Influence
The Intersection of Religion and International Business: Understanding Pope Leo's Influence
In today’s global marketplace, business decisions are shaped by a complex web of economic, political,...
Read More
Pope Leo’s Emphasis on Social Justice: Implications for Corporate Governance and ESG Reporting Pope Leo XIII might not be the first name that comes to mind when thinking about supply chains, board structures, or ESG metrics—but perhaps he should be. In 1891, with the encyclical Rerum Novarum, Pope Leo XIII became one of the earliest modern figures to articulate a systematic philosophy of social justice grounded in dignity, fairness, and responsibility within economic life. Over a century later, his message is finding surprising resonance in boardrooms, compliance frameworks, and ESG reports. As global businesses, particularly those operating across borders in the export-import arena, face mounting scrutiny over how they treat workers, engage communities, and protect the environment, the principles championed by Pope Leo offer more than ethical guidance. They offer a blueprint for long-term, resilient corporate governance. Revisiting Rerum Novarum: The Origins of Modern Social Doctrine Issued in response to the harsh conditions of the industrial revolution, Rerum Novarum—Latin for “Of New Things”—was Pope Leo XIII’s response to capitalism’s rapid evolution. The encyclical didn’t condemn free markets outright but warned against the dehumanisation of labour and unchecked industrial power. Its key tenets included: The right to private property, balanced by the obligation to use it responsibly. The dignity of labour and the necessity of a living wage. The importance of trade unions and collective bargaining. The role of the state in protecting vulnerable populations. A critique of both unregulated capitalism and radical socialism. In effect, Leo XIII laid out a social framework that prioritised human dignity over profit maximisation. And while this doctrine was originally written for a 19th-century Europe grappling with mechanisation and urban poverty, its philosophical architecture is highly relevant to today’s conversations on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards. From Papal Doctrine to ESG Standards: The Bridge ESG has become the de facto language for expressing how corporations manage risks and opportunities beyond traditional financial metrics. But at its core, ESG is about values translated into systems: how we treat people, how we steward resources, and how we design institutions to be accountable. In this context, Pope Leo’s teachings become not only compatible with ESG but foundational to it. Consider the thematic overlap: Social justice aligns with Social (S) in ESG, covering labour conditions, employee wellbeing, and equitable supply chains. Ethical use of property aligns with Governance (G), touching on shareholder responsibility, executive accountability, and ethical decision-making. Concern for the common good parallels Environmental (E) imperatives, especially the long-term view of sustainability and stewardship. This is particularly relevant for multinational export-import players who straddle jurisdictions, labour regimes, and supply chains that often include both highly regulated markets and vulnerable geographies. Corporate Governance: A New Moral Imperative Corporate governance is no longer just about fiduciary responsibility and compliance checklists. Boards are now expected to think critically about systemic risks—climate, inequality, supply chain fragility—and to embed values into business models. This is where Pope Leo’s influence becomes strategically significant. His emphasis on subsidiarity, a principle later elaborated in Catholic social teaching, holds that decisions should be made at the lowest competent level. Applied to corporate governance, this suggests empowering local suppliers, decentralising certain ESG strategies, and trusting community-rooted partners rather than imposing top-down mandates. For export-import firms, especially those operating in developing economies, this governance model encourages: Partnering with local stakeholders on environmental and social policies. Ensuring board diversity includes voices with on-the-ground operational or social insight. Establishing ethical trade committees that go beyond legal compliance into moral accountability. A good example comes from Unilever, which embedded sustainability goals directly into board oversight mechanisms, giving ESG performance equal weight to traditional financial KPIs. This approach reflects not just smart governance but the moral sensibility that Leo XIII envisioned—a business accountable not only to shareholders but to society at large. Social Justice in Supply Chains: From Ethics to Action One of Pope Leo’s most striking contributions was his insistence on a “living wage”—a concept that remains radical in many parts of the world. Today, the globalised supply chain continues to struggle with this legacy. From textile factories in Bangladesh to cobalt mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo, millions of workers form the backbone of export-import networks, yet live on precarious wages with minimal protections. ESG reporting frameworks such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) now require disclosure of workforce conditions, safety, gender pay gaps, and forced labour risk. These aren’t just regulatory pressures—they're extensions of the same ethical imperative Leo XIII articulated: the dignity of work and the rights of workers. For global firms, this means: Auditing suppliers for not only compliance but dignity—ensuring workers have safe conditions, fair pay, and voice mechanisms. Moving from reactive CSR donations to proactive value-chain transformation. Embracing long-term contracts with suppliers that reward ethical practices over lowest-cost bids. Apple, for instance, began publishing annual supply chain responsibility reports in the 2010s, and while not perfect, the move to public accountability mirrors the moral transparency that Pope Leo would consider essential in any economic structure. ESG Reporting: The Shift From Optics to Substance Pope Leo XIII warned against philanthropy as a substitute for justice. Today, businesses are often accused of “greenwashing” or “social-washing”—presenting ESG initiatives as branding exercises rather than embedded values. This is where his legacy offers a potent corrective. True ESG alignment demands that social impact is not confined to a side office in marketing, but woven into procurement strategies, capital allocation, and product development. To do this effectively, companies must move beyond disclosure to deliberation: What ethical lens do we use when selecting markets or partners? How are decisions about automation, relocation, or workforce reduction made—and who benefits? Does our ESG data reflect lived realities, or merely pass the materiality test? The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), set to impact over 50,000 companies by 2026, moves toward this deeper integration by requiring not just narrative sustainability reports, but auditable, standardised ESG data. Firms that fail to build internal ESG data systems now will face reputational and regulatory penalties soon. Investor Sentiment and Catholic Social Ethics Interestingly, investor behaviour is also converging with Leo XIII’s ethics. Impact investing, faith-based investing, and ESG screening are no longer niche. According to the Global Sustainable Investment Review, global sustainable investment reached $35.3 trillion in 2020, accounting for more than a third of total assets under management. Faith-aligned investment groups, including Catholic institutions managing multi-billion-dollar endowments, increasingly exclude companies that violate labour rights, degrade ecosystems, or operate in high-conflict zones. Pope Leo’s social vision now directly influences capital flows. Export-import players hoping to attract institutional investors must demonstrate more than quarterly earnings—they must articulate how their operations align with justice, stewardship, and human dignity. These are not soft values; they are becoming capital differentiators. The Strategic Advantage of Moral Clarity It’s tempting to see ESG as a chore, an imposition from regulators and activist investors. But Leo XIII saw something deeper: that systems built without moral clarity eventually become unstable. Whether it’s collapsing supply chains during a pandemic, extreme weather disrupting logistics, or social unrest in response to inequality, businesses today are paying the price for ignoring the societal context in which they operate. For those in export-import—where interdependence, visibility, and velocity define competitive advantage—moral clarity is not just a compass. It’s a risk management tool. Embracing the social justice principles articulated by Pope Leo XIII is not about religious observance. It’s about recognising that every contract, every shipment, and every business decision takes place in a moral landscape. Companies that map that terrain wisely will build trust, attract capital, and sustain value in a turbulent century. Final Thought: The Long View Matters Pope Leo XIII understood that economic systems shape souls, not just markets. As ESG matures from a trend to a global standard, his insistence on dignity, justice, and moral economy becomes increasingly relevant. Businesses that embrace this long view—treating social responsibility as governance, not charity—will not only report better metrics. They’ll build more enduring, ethical, and ultimately profitable operations. Join Hi-Fella Today! As Pope Leo’s enduring emphasis on social justice gains renewed relevance in today’s ESG-driven business landscape, export-import companies must rise to the challenge of aligning profit with purpose. Hi-Fella supports this shift by connecting you with ethically aligned partners, offering transparency tools to enhance ESG reporting, and enabling responsible sourcing across global markets. Whether you're aiming to meet new governance standards or build a supply chain that reflects your values, Hi-Fella empowers you to trade responsibly while staying competitive in a world where ethics and economics go hand in hand.
Pope Leo’s Emphasis on Social Justice: Implications for Corporate Governance and ESG Reporting
Pope Leo XIII might not be the first name that comes to mind when thinking about supply chains, board...
Read More
UK Wildfires Highlight Climate Risks: What Businesses Should Consider
UK Wildfires Highlight Climate Risks: What Businesses Should Consider
Wildfires in the United Kingdom were once a statistical rarity, relegated to the heathlands and moorlands...
Philippines 2025 Elections: Implications for Foreign Investors and Trade Policies
Philippines 2025 Elections: Implications for Foreign Investors and Trade Policies
In May 2025, the Philippines will hold its midterm elections—a political event that may not grab global...