Hi-Fella Insights

Is Your Supply Chain Ready for the Next Global Pandemic?

If there’s one lesson the global business community learned from COVID-19, it’s this: supply chains are only as strong as their weakest link. What started as a health crisis in early 2020 quickly became a full-blown economic disruption, shuttering factories, grounding flights, bottlenecking ports, and wiping billions off balance sheets.

For players in global export-import, the pandemic was more than a black swan—it was a system-wide stress test. The impact was uneven. Some businesses collapsed under the weight of their own complexity. Others adapted, rerouted, digitised, and emerged leaner, faster, and more resilient.

Now, as the world stabilises, there’s a growing consensus among experts: another pandemic is not a question of if, but when. The World Health Organization refers to this hypothetical threat as “Disease X.” Whether it emerges from zoonotic transfer, antimicrobial resistance, or synthetic biology gone wrong, global interconnectedness means that any future outbreak will once again reverberate through logistics, trade flows, and production lines.

So the real question is: is your supply chain ready for the next global pandemic?

The Next Pandemic Will Hit Supply Chains Differently

Future pandemics won’t play out exactly like COVID-19. The nature of the disease, its geographic origin, and the political response will all shape how trade and transport are impacted. But we can expect common stress points to reappear:

  • Factory lockdowns and labour shortages
  • Export bans on essential goods
  • Disrupted ocean freight and air cargo routes
  • Cross-border delays due to health checks and customs bottlenecks
  • Surging demand for PPE, pharmaceuticals, and critical raw materials

In a 2021 McKinsey Global Institute report, 93% of supply chain leaders said they planned to increase resilience through diversification, nearshoring, and digitisation. Yet by 2023, fewer than 45% had meaningfully acted on those plans (McKinsey, 2023). That gap between intention and execution is a vulnerability.

Risk Mapping: Know What Broke Last Time

Step one to pandemic-proofing is knowing your failure points. During COVID-19, businesses with multi-tiered supply chains often had no visibility into second- and third-tier suppliers, particularly in raw materials or sub-assemblies. When a factory in Wuhan or Lombardy shut down, Tier 1 suppliers had nothing to pass down the line.

Ask yourself:

  • Do you know where your suppliers get their components from?
  • Can you identify which inputs are sourced from high-risk countries?
  • What percentage of your product value is concentrated in one geography or one vendor?

Supply chain mapping tools like Resilinc, Interos, and Everstream Analytics are designed to reveal these hidden dependencies. The goal is not paranoia—it’s visibility. You can’t mitigate what you can’t see.

Supplier Diversification: More Than a Buzzword

Everyone talks about diversification, but doing it well takes planning, capital, and trust-building. There are four practical dimensions to consider:

  • Geographic diversification: Avoid over-reliance on a single country or region. Don’t just look for “China +1” anymore—think “China + Southeast Asia + LATAM + Eastern Europe.”
  • Tiered redundancy: Secure multiple suppliers for critical components, especially for upstream inputs like raw chemicals, active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), semiconductors, or packaging materials.
  • Contractual agility: Include pandemic clauses in supplier contracts—around delivery guarantees, inventory obligations, and disaster recovery commitments.
  • Ethical sourcing: Future pandemics may trigger more stringent ESG scrutiny. Suppliers with poor labour practices or unsafe working conditions will face shutdowns and public backlash faster than before.

The key is balance. Too much diversification increases cost and complexity. Too little makes you fragile. Striking that balance is where the competitive edge lies.

Inventory Strategy: Rethink Just-In-Time

Just-In-Time (JIT) manufacturing made sense in a stable, predictable world. It doesn’t in an age of recurring disruptions. During COVID, companies with JIT models faced stockouts within days, especially in fast-moving consumer goods, electronics, and automotive sectors.

That’s why the trend has shifted toward Just-In-Case (JIC). But this doesn’t mean hoarding—smart inventory strategy is nuanced.

  • Strategic buffer stock: Hold inventory only for high-risk SKUs or components with long lead times.
  • Multi-location warehousing: Avoid concentrating inventory in one geographic zone vulnerable to lockdowns or port closures.
  • Vendor-managed inventory (VMI): Use supplier-led replenishment models to increase responsiveness without owning excess stock.

Warehouse automation and AI-based demand forecasting tools can make JIC affordable. Companies like Blue Yonder, Kinaxis, and Llamasoft (now part of Coupa) provide advanced solutions here.

Logistics: Build Flexibility into Freight

The last pandemic crushed global logistics capacity. Container freight rates from China to the US West Coast soared from $1,500 to over $20,000 per FEU at their 2021 peak (Drewry, 2021). Air cargo was worse—capacity vanished as passenger flights were grounded.

Going forward, exporters and importers must develop freight agility:

  • Multi-modal shipping: Blend sea, air, and rail options to bypass chokepoints.
  • Blank sailing strategies: Work with carriers that offer guaranteed space or priority loading agreements.
  • Digital freight platforms like Flexport, Freightos, and FourKites can provide real-time visibility, capacity options, and automated rerouting.

Also consider regional logistics hubs. Moving inventory to neutral or less-restricted regions during a crisis (e.g., Singapore, UAE, Panama) provides optionality when national borders tighten.

Digitisation: Information is Your Survival Tool

Digital tools are the foundation of pandemic resilience. They deliver speed, clarity, and data-driven decision-making when human systems are overwhelmed.

Here’s what high-performing supply chains have:

  • End-to-end visibility platforms: Knowing the status of every shipment, inventory pool, and supplier in real-time.
  • AI-driven scenario modeling: What happens if X country shuts down? How do I reroute Y material? Digital twins can simulate and solve before reality hits.
  • Blockchain-based traceability: Especially relevant in food, pharmaceuticals, and high-value goods—consumers and regulators want to know origin, handling, and safety history.

Companies like IBM Sterling, SAP Integrated Business Planning, and Oracle SCM Cloud are investing heavily in these areas. For SMEs, lightweight SaaS solutions like TradeLens, Anvyl, or Infor Nexus offer good entry points.

Workforce and Operations: Don’t Ignore the Human Element

Your supply chain is only as resilient as the people who run it. During COVID-19, companies struggled not just with material shortages, but also with labour absenteeism, health protocols, and mental health breakdowns across production and logistics teams.

What to plan for:

  • Cross-trained teams: So that key roles can be rotated or covered during absenteeism.
  • Remote-ready management: Tools and SOPs that allow planning and coordination to continue even from home offices.
  • On-site health infrastructure: PPE protocols, testing kits, isolation facilities, and occupational health training.

And don’t overlook morale. The next pandemic will test not just systems, but people’s resolve. Supply chains that care for their workforce during crisis recover faster and retain talent better.

Government and Trade Policy: Expect a New Wave of Regulation

Global supply chains will likely face pandemic-era protectionism in the next crisis. Export bans on essentials, preferential treatment for domestic manufacturers, and tighter customs health controls will return.

Some signs of what to expect:

  • Export licensing regimes on medical goods, agri-products, and energy-related materials.
  • “Buy National” incentives, especially in critical industries like pharma, semiconductors, and defence.
  • Digital health passports for freight, personnel, and facilities.

To stay ahead, businesses should:

  • Monitor WTO and regional trade updates regularly.
  • Build customs compliance expertise or retain access to rapid-response trade law advisors.
  • Engage with chambers of commerce and export credit agencies that may offer support programs during pandemics.

Final Thoughts: Readiness is a Mindset, Not a Checklist

You can’t eliminate supply chain risk entirely, but you can design for resilience. That means investing in agility, visibility, and relationships before a crisis hits—not during.

The next pandemic may not look like COVID-19. But its disruption will test every weak point you’ve ignored. Export-import businesses that have learned from the past—and act now—will not only survive the next wave, they’ll lead the rebuild.

This isn’t alarmism. It’s operational realism. As we move deeper into the 21st century, resilience is the new competitive advantage. And the time to build it is now.

Join Hi-Fella Today!

If the next global pandemic strikes, will your supply chain be ready — or vulnerable? With Hi-Fella, export-import businesses gain a powerful advantage: access to a diversified, verified network of global partners, real-time trade updates, and smart tools to adapt quickly under pressure. Hi-Fella empowers you to build resilient supply chains, source reliably across multiple regions, and stay connected even when borders close. 

Don’t wait for disruption to expose the cracks — future-proof your operations now with Hi-Fella and stay one step ahead, no matter what the world throws your way.

About Author

Zhafran Tsany

Zhafran Tsany

Leave a Reply

Other Article

The Intersection of Religion and International Business: Understanding Pope Leo's Influence
The Intersection of Religion and International Business: Understanding Pope Leo's Influence
In today’s global marketplace, business decisions are shaped by a complex web of economic, political,...
Read More
Pope Leo’s Emphasis on Social Justice: Implications for Corporate Governance and ESG Reporting Pope Leo XIII might not be the first name that comes to mind when thinking about supply chains, board structures, or ESG metrics—but perhaps he should be. In 1891, with the encyclical Rerum Novarum, Pope Leo XIII became one of the earliest modern figures to articulate a systematic philosophy of social justice grounded in dignity, fairness, and responsibility within economic life. Over a century later, his message is finding surprising resonance in boardrooms, compliance frameworks, and ESG reports. As global businesses, particularly those operating across borders in the export-import arena, face mounting scrutiny over how they treat workers, engage communities, and protect the environment, the principles championed by Pope Leo offer more than ethical guidance. They offer a blueprint for long-term, resilient corporate governance. Revisiting Rerum Novarum: The Origins of Modern Social Doctrine Issued in response to the harsh conditions of the industrial revolution, Rerum Novarum—Latin for “Of New Things”—was Pope Leo XIII’s response to capitalism’s rapid evolution. The encyclical didn’t condemn free markets outright but warned against the dehumanisation of labour and unchecked industrial power. Its key tenets included: The right to private property, balanced by the obligation to use it responsibly. The dignity of labour and the necessity of a living wage. The importance of trade unions and collective bargaining. The role of the state in protecting vulnerable populations. A critique of both unregulated capitalism and radical socialism. In effect, Leo XIII laid out a social framework that prioritised human dignity over profit maximisation. And while this doctrine was originally written for a 19th-century Europe grappling with mechanisation and urban poverty, its philosophical architecture is highly relevant to today’s conversations on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards. From Papal Doctrine to ESG Standards: The Bridge ESG has become the de facto language for expressing how corporations manage risks and opportunities beyond traditional financial metrics. But at its core, ESG is about values translated into systems: how we treat people, how we steward resources, and how we design institutions to be accountable. In this context, Pope Leo’s teachings become not only compatible with ESG but foundational to it. Consider the thematic overlap: Social justice aligns with Social (S) in ESG, covering labour conditions, employee wellbeing, and equitable supply chains. Ethical use of property aligns with Governance (G), touching on shareholder responsibility, executive accountability, and ethical decision-making. Concern for the common good parallels Environmental (E) imperatives, especially the long-term view of sustainability and stewardship. This is particularly relevant for multinational export-import players who straddle jurisdictions, labour regimes, and supply chains that often include both highly regulated markets and vulnerable geographies. Corporate Governance: A New Moral Imperative Corporate governance is no longer just about fiduciary responsibility and compliance checklists. Boards are now expected to think critically about systemic risks—climate, inequality, supply chain fragility—and to embed values into business models. This is where Pope Leo’s influence becomes strategically significant. His emphasis on subsidiarity, a principle later elaborated in Catholic social teaching, holds that decisions should be made at the lowest competent level. Applied to corporate governance, this suggests empowering local suppliers, decentralising certain ESG strategies, and trusting community-rooted partners rather than imposing top-down mandates. For export-import firms, especially those operating in developing economies, this governance model encourages: Partnering with local stakeholders on environmental and social policies. Ensuring board diversity includes voices with on-the-ground operational or social insight. Establishing ethical trade committees that go beyond legal compliance into moral accountability. A good example comes from Unilever, which embedded sustainability goals directly into board oversight mechanisms, giving ESG performance equal weight to traditional financial KPIs. This approach reflects not just smart governance but the moral sensibility that Leo XIII envisioned—a business accountable not only to shareholders but to society at large. Social Justice in Supply Chains: From Ethics to Action One of Pope Leo’s most striking contributions was his insistence on a “living wage”—a concept that remains radical in many parts of the world. Today, the globalised supply chain continues to struggle with this legacy. From textile factories in Bangladesh to cobalt mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo, millions of workers form the backbone of export-import networks, yet live on precarious wages with minimal protections. ESG reporting frameworks such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) now require disclosure of workforce conditions, safety, gender pay gaps, and forced labour risk. These aren’t just regulatory pressures—they're extensions of the same ethical imperative Leo XIII articulated: the dignity of work and the rights of workers. For global firms, this means: Auditing suppliers for not only compliance but dignity—ensuring workers have safe conditions, fair pay, and voice mechanisms. Moving from reactive CSR donations to proactive value-chain transformation. Embracing long-term contracts with suppliers that reward ethical practices over lowest-cost bids. Apple, for instance, began publishing annual supply chain responsibility reports in the 2010s, and while not perfect, the move to public accountability mirrors the moral transparency that Pope Leo would consider essential in any economic structure. ESG Reporting: The Shift From Optics to Substance Pope Leo XIII warned against philanthropy as a substitute for justice. Today, businesses are often accused of “greenwashing” or “social-washing”—presenting ESG initiatives as branding exercises rather than embedded values. This is where his legacy offers a potent corrective. True ESG alignment demands that social impact is not confined to a side office in marketing, but woven into procurement strategies, capital allocation, and product development. To do this effectively, companies must move beyond disclosure to deliberation: What ethical lens do we use when selecting markets or partners? How are decisions about automation, relocation, or workforce reduction made—and who benefits? Does our ESG data reflect lived realities, or merely pass the materiality test? The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), set to impact over 50,000 companies by 2026, moves toward this deeper integration by requiring not just narrative sustainability reports, but auditable, standardised ESG data. Firms that fail to build internal ESG data systems now will face reputational and regulatory penalties soon. Investor Sentiment and Catholic Social Ethics Interestingly, investor behaviour is also converging with Leo XIII’s ethics. Impact investing, faith-based investing, and ESG screening are no longer niche. According to the Global Sustainable Investment Review, global sustainable investment reached $35.3 trillion in 2020, accounting for more than a third of total assets under management. Faith-aligned investment groups, including Catholic institutions managing multi-billion-dollar endowments, increasingly exclude companies that violate labour rights, degrade ecosystems, or operate in high-conflict zones. Pope Leo’s social vision now directly influences capital flows. Export-import players hoping to attract institutional investors must demonstrate more than quarterly earnings—they must articulate how their operations align with justice, stewardship, and human dignity. These are not soft values; they are becoming capital differentiators. The Strategic Advantage of Moral Clarity It’s tempting to see ESG as a chore, an imposition from regulators and activist investors. But Leo XIII saw something deeper: that systems built without moral clarity eventually become unstable. Whether it’s collapsing supply chains during a pandemic, extreme weather disrupting logistics, or social unrest in response to inequality, businesses today are paying the price for ignoring the societal context in which they operate. For those in export-import—where interdependence, visibility, and velocity define competitive advantage—moral clarity is not just a compass. It’s a risk management tool. Embracing the social justice principles articulated by Pope Leo XIII is not about religious observance. It’s about recognising that every contract, every shipment, and every business decision takes place in a moral landscape. Companies that map that terrain wisely will build trust, attract capital, and sustain value in a turbulent century. Final Thought: The Long View Matters Pope Leo XIII understood that economic systems shape souls, not just markets. As ESG matures from a trend to a global standard, his insistence on dignity, justice, and moral economy becomes increasingly relevant. Businesses that embrace this long view—treating social responsibility as governance, not charity—will not only report better metrics. They’ll build more enduring, ethical, and ultimately profitable operations. Join Hi-Fella Today! As Pope Leo’s enduring emphasis on social justice gains renewed relevance in today’s ESG-driven business landscape, export-import companies must rise to the challenge of aligning profit with purpose. Hi-Fella supports this shift by connecting you with ethically aligned partners, offering transparency tools to enhance ESG reporting, and enabling responsible sourcing across global markets. Whether you're aiming to meet new governance standards or build a supply chain that reflects your values, Hi-Fella empowers you to trade responsibly while staying competitive in a world where ethics and economics go hand in hand.
Pope Leo’s Emphasis on Social Justice: Implications for Corporate Governance and ESG Reporting
Pope Leo XIII might not be the first name that comes to mind when thinking about supply chains, board...
Read More
UK Wildfires Highlight Climate Risks: What Businesses Should Consider
UK Wildfires Highlight Climate Risks: What Businesses Should Consider
Wildfires in the United Kingdom were once a statistical rarity, relegated to the heathlands and moorlands...
Philippines 2025 Elections: Implications for Foreign Investors and Trade Policies
Philippines 2025 Elections: Implications for Foreign Investors and Trade Policies
In May 2025, the Philippines will hold its midterm elections—a political event that may not grab global...