Hi-Fella Insights

New Business Opportunities Arising from the Easing of US–China Tensions

The US–China relationship is arguably the most influential bilateral dynamic in global trade today. Over the last few years, businesses have been navigating one of the rockiest patches in modern economic history—trade wars, tit-for-tat tariffs, tech bans, and investment restrictions. But 2024 brought a noticeable shift. Signals from both Washington and Beijing indicate a desire to stabilise ties, at least economically. That easing of tension is not just diplomatic—it’s opening up real business opportunities.

For global export-import players, this détente is more than good news. It’s the unlocking of multi-billion-dollar potential across industries that have been on pause, sidetracked, or operating in grey zones. Now is the time to pay close attention, reassess the landscape, and position yourself to benefit.

The Diplomatic Reset: What’s Really Changing?

After years of strained interactions, the Biden administration and Xi Jinping’s government have made strides toward improving communication. The November 2023 San Francisco summit was a critical turning point. There, both sides agreed to resume military dialogues, deepen cooperation on climate, and crucially—restore key trade channels.

By early 2024, the following developments took shape:

  • The Bilateral Commercial Exchange Council resumed, fostering more regular economic dialogue.
  • Tariff rollbacks were proposed on a selective basis, particularly on consumer electronics and agricultural goods.
  • The US Commerce Department granted temporary general licenses to allow limited technology exports to Chinese firms, pending tighter regulatory reviews.
  • Both countries expressed mutual support for supply chain resilience collaboration, especially in areas like pharmaceuticals and clean energy.

These aren’t just symbolic. They signal operational shifts that open up new lanes for business.

Export Revival: Manufacturing and Consumer Electronics

During the height of the trade war (2018–2020), tariffs and sanctions hit manufacturing hard. US importers turned to Southeast Asia to diversify, and Chinese exporters shifted to non-US markets. But full decoupling never really materialised, because for many industries, the China-US trade axis remains too large to ignore.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, bilateral goods trade still hit $575 billion in 2023, down from the 2018 peak of $659 billion, but proving resilience. With tariffs loosening in 2024, many companies are revisiting paused sourcing plans or expanding existing deals.

Business opportunities:

  • OEM and ODM manufacturing deals between US brands and Chinese factories are making a comeback, particularly in the consumer tech and smart appliance sectors.
  • Importers can renegotiate logistics and customs arrangements now that tariff risks are lower, reducing total landed cost.
  • Component manufacturers in Taiwan and China’s Greater Bay Area are seeing renewed interest from US electronics and automotive firms.

For businesses involved in freight forwarding, customs brokerage, or sourcing consultancy, this is a prime window to facilitate re-entries and optimise supply chains.

Agriculture and Agri-Tech: Back to the Table

Agricultural trade was one of the first victims of US–China hostilities. Soybeans, pork, and dairy exports from the US plummeted as Beijing pivoted to Brazil, Argentina, and Europe. But China still relies on massive imports to feed its population—especially protein and grains.

In 2024, we’re seeing a rebound. USDA data shows that US soybean exports to China increased 9% in Q1 2024 year-over-year, driven by tariff exemptions and improved phytosanitary negotiations.

Opportunities opening up:

  • US agricultural exporters can expand soybean, corn, and pork volumes to China, especially under private-sector contracts.
  • Export-import intermediaries can broker new deals for agri-tech machinery, irrigation systems, and smart greenhouse technology, areas that China is investing in heavily.
  • Cold chain logistics providers stand to benefit from renewed frozen meat and perishable export flows.

For Latin American suppliers and traders, there’s room to serve as secondary or overflow suppliers to China as it rebalances between US and non-US sources.

Tech and Semiconductor Trade: Cautious But Lucrative

Tech remains the most sensitive area in US–China ties. Washington’s restrictions on advanced semiconductor exports to China are still largely in place. However, the easing of tensions is facilitating non-sensitive tech trade—mid-range chips, hardware components, and software services for civilian use.

The semiconductor supply chain is complex. Even with some bans, business continues in areas like testing equipment, legacy node manufacturing, and chip design services. In 2024, Qualcomm resumed shipments of certain 4G chips to Chinese handset makers under export licenses, and Applied Materials saw renewed equipment orders.

Emerging opportunities:

  • Exporters and logistics companies that specialise in semiconductor manufacturing equipment (SME), printed circuit boards, and connectors can expect higher volume.
  • Investors and import-export firms may find new openings in chip design collaboration, particularly through joint R&D ventures in Singapore or Hong Kong.
  • Importers of industrial robotics and AI-integrated systems will benefit from reduced scrutiny when operating in the non-military domain.

Expect this space to evolve cautiously, but for many companies not on any entity list, there’s a clear path to renewed or expanded business.

Green Tech and Climate Collaboration

One of the most promising zones of cooperation is climate technology. Both China and the US have pledged major emissions reductions, and both have a vested interest in developing affordable clean energy solutions.

Recent agreements have paved the way for joint investment and knowledge-sharing in EVs, solar power, and battery technology. For export-import players, this is an arena where both governments are actively encouraging cooperation.

Where the growth is:

  • Cross-border trade in lithium batteries, solar panels, and wind turbine components is heating up, particularly in third-party markets like Southeast Asia.
  • There’s growing demand for recycling and waste management technologies, where US expertise complements China’s scale.
  • Freight and logistics firms can explore specialised services for handling sensitive or hazardous green tech shipments under new compliance standards.

China’s 2024 Green Industry Report estimates that green infrastructure investment will grow by over $600 billion by 2027, with half of that projected to involve foreign partnerships.

Logistics and Cross-Border Trade Platforms

With trade volume picking up again, so too is demand for smarter and more efficient cross-border logistics solutions. The e-commerce boom, coupled with trade normalisation, is breathing new life into freight forwarding, port services, bonded warehousing, and last-mile delivery.

Tech-enabled logistics firms are particularly well-positioned. Alibaba’s Cainiao and JD Logistics are expanding globally, while US-based platforms like Flexport are recalibrating their China operations.

Opportunities to capture:

  • Freight operators with US–China lanes will benefit from increased volumes and more predictable schedules post-tariff de-escalation.
  • SMEs can now tap into trade financing, customs automation, and platform-based sourcing, helping them scale exports or imports without the need for large-scale operations.
  • Digital trade platforms (like Alibaba, DHGate, and even Amazon’s Global Selling program) are seeing rising enrolment from manufacturers and wholesalers eager to re-enter US markets.

Services, Tourism, and Professional Exchanges

Business isn’t just about goods—services trade is also resuming. Visa agreements are being relaxed, business travel is picking up, and universities are reporting increased Chinese student applications to the US.

Meanwhile, financial services are gradually reopening. BlackRock and Goldman Sachs have resumed wealth management activity in China, and Beijing is signaling openness to foreign capital under new risk frameworks.

Where this matters:

  • Export-import advisors, legal firms, and compliance consultants will see demand from firms navigating resumed trade rules.
  • Education consultants and hospitality companies will benefit from returning Chinese student and tourist flows to the US.
  • Cross-border M&A advisory, especially for clean tech and healthcare, is becoming more viable again.

Final Thoughts: A Cautious Green Light

Let’s be clear—this is not a return to the pre-2018 “golden age” of US–China trade. Strategic competition remains, and new barriers could arise. But what we’re witnessing now is a window of relative stability. And for global businesses, windows like this don’t come often—and don’t stay open forever.

Easing tensions mean opportunities to expand trade, forge new partnerships, and move capital, technology, and services across borders more smoothly. For export-import players who stayed agile during the tough years, this is your moment to act.

Keep monitoring policy, diversify your risk, but lean into the opportunity. Because in global trade, the calm after the storm is often the best time to set sail.

Join Hi-Fella Today!

As US–China tensions begin to ease, fresh opportunities are opening up for agile export-import businesses ready to seize them — and Hi-Fella is your ideal launchpad. With access to a global database of verified buyers and suppliers, real-time trade insights, and tools that simplify cross-border connections, Hi-Fella helps you move fast and smart in a shifting geopolitical climate. 

Whether you’re re-entering familiar markets or exploring new ones, Hi-Fella ensures you’re strategically positioned to capitalise on renewed trade flows and build lasting, profitable relationships worldwide.

About Author

Zhafran Tsany

Zhafran Tsany

Leave a Reply

Other Article

The Intersection of Religion and International Business: Understanding Pope Leo's Influence
The Intersection of Religion and International Business: Understanding Pope Leo's Influence
In today’s global marketplace, business decisions are shaped by a complex web of economic, political,...
Read More
Pope Leo’s Emphasis on Social Justice: Implications for Corporate Governance and ESG Reporting Pope Leo XIII might not be the first name that comes to mind when thinking about supply chains, board structures, or ESG metrics—but perhaps he should be. In 1891, with the encyclical Rerum Novarum, Pope Leo XIII became one of the earliest modern figures to articulate a systematic philosophy of social justice grounded in dignity, fairness, and responsibility within economic life. Over a century later, his message is finding surprising resonance in boardrooms, compliance frameworks, and ESG reports. As global businesses, particularly those operating across borders in the export-import arena, face mounting scrutiny over how they treat workers, engage communities, and protect the environment, the principles championed by Pope Leo offer more than ethical guidance. They offer a blueprint for long-term, resilient corporate governance. Revisiting Rerum Novarum: The Origins of Modern Social Doctrine Issued in response to the harsh conditions of the industrial revolution, Rerum Novarum—Latin for “Of New Things”—was Pope Leo XIII’s response to capitalism’s rapid evolution. The encyclical didn’t condemn free markets outright but warned against the dehumanisation of labour and unchecked industrial power. Its key tenets included: The right to private property, balanced by the obligation to use it responsibly. The dignity of labour and the necessity of a living wage. The importance of trade unions and collective bargaining. The role of the state in protecting vulnerable populations. A critique of both unregulated capitalism and radical socialism. In effect, Leo XIII laid out a social framework that prioritised human dignity over profit maximisation. And while this doctrine was originally written for a 19th-century Europe grappling with mechanisation and urban poverty, its philosophical architecture is highly relevant to today’s conversations on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards. From Papal Doctrine to ESG Standards: The Bridge ESG has become the de facto language for expressing how corporations manage risks and opportunities beyond traditional financial metrics. But at its core, ESG is about values translated into systems: how we treat people, how we steward resources, and how we design institutions to be accountable. In this context, Pope Leo’s teachings become not only compatible with ESG but foundational to it. Consider the thematic overlap: Social justice aligns with Social (S) in ESG, covering labour conditions, employee wellbeing, and equitable supply chains. Ethical use of property aligns with Governance (G), touching on shareholder responsibility, executive accountability, and ethical decision-making. Concern for the common good parallels Environmental (E) imperatives, especially the long-term view of sustainability and stewardship. This is particularly relevant for multinational export-import players who straddle jurisdictions, labour regimes, and supply chains that often include both highly regulated markets and vulnerable geographies. Corporate Governance: A New Moral Imperative Corporate governance is no longer just about fiduciary responsibility and compliance checklists. Boards are now expected to think critically about systemic risks—climate, inequality, supply chain fragility—and to embed values into business models. This is where Pope Leo’s influence becomes strategically significant. His emphasis on subsidiarity, a principle later elaborated in Catholic social teaching, holds that decisions should be made at the lowest competent level. Applied to corporate governance, this suggests empowering local suppliers, decentralising certain ESG strategies, and trusting community-rooted partners rather than imposing top-down mandates. For export-import firms, especially those operating in developing economies, this governance model encourages: Partnering with local stakeholders on environmental and social policies. Ensuring board diversity includes voices with on-the-ground operational or social insight. Establishing ethical trade committees that go beyond legal compliance into moral accountability. A good example comes from Unilever, which embedded sustainability goals directly into board oversight mechanisms, giving ESG performance equal weight to traditional financial KPIs. This approach reflects not just smart governance but the moral sensibility that Leo XIII envisioned—a business accountable not only to shareholders but to society at large. Social Justice in Supply Chains: From Ethics to Action One of Pope Leo’s most striking contributions was his insistence on a “living wage”—a concept that remains radical in many parts of the world. Today, the globalised supply chain continues to struggle with this legacy. From textile factories in Bangladesh to cobalt mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo, millions of workers form the backbone of export-import networks, yet live on precarious wages with minimal protections. ESG reporting frameworks such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) now require disclosure of workforce conditions, safety, gender pay gaps, and forced labour risk. These aren’t just regulatory pressures—they're extensions of the same ethical imperative Leo XIII articulated: the dignity of work and the rights of workers. For global firms, this means: Auditing suppliers for not only compliance but dignity—ensuring workers have safe conditions, fair pay, and voice mechanisms. Moving from reactive CSR donations to proactive value-chain transformation. Embracing long-term contracts with suppliers that reward ethical practices over lowest-cost bids. Apple, for instance, began publishing annual supply chain responsibility reports in the 2010s, and while not perfect, the move to public accountability mirrors the moral transparency that Pope Leo would consider essential in any economic structure. ESG Reporting: The Shift From Optics to Substance Pope Leo XIII warned against philanthropy as a substitute for justice. Today, businesses are often accused of “greenwashing” or “social-washing”—presenting ESG initiatives as branding exercises rather than embedded values. This is where his legacy offers a potent corrective. True ESG alignment demands that social impact is not confined to a side office in marketing, but woven into procurement strategies, capital allocation, and product development. To do this effectively, companies must move beyond disclosure to deliberation: What ethical lens do we use when selecting markets or partners? How are decisions about automation, relocation, or workforce reduction made—and who benefits? Does our ESG data reflect lived realities, or merely pass the materiality test? The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), set to impact over 50,000 companies by 2026, moves toward this deeper integration by requiring not just narrative sustainability reports, but auditable, standardised ESG data. Firms that fail to build internal ESG data systems now will face reputational and regulatory penalties soon. Investor Sentiment and Catholic Social Ethics Interestingly, investor behaviour is also converging with Leo XIII’s ethics. Impact investing, faith-based investing, and ESG screening are no longer niche. According to the Global Sustainable Investment Review, global sustainable investment reached $35.3 trillion in 2020, accounting for more than a third of total assets under management. Faith-aligned investment groups, including Catholic institutions managing multi-billion-dollar endowments, increasingly exclude companies that violate labour rights, degrade ecosystems, or operate in high-conflict zones. Pope Leo’s social vision now directly influences capital flows. Export-import players hoping to attract institutional investors must demonstrate more than quarterly earnings—they must articulate how their operations align with justice, stewardship, and human dignity. These are not soft values; they are becoming capital differentiators. The Strategic Advantage of Moral Clarity It’s tempting to see ESG as a chore, an imposition from regulators and activist investors. But Leo XIII saw something deeper: that systems built without moral clarity eventually become unstable. Whether it’s collapsing supply chains during a pandemic, extreme weather disrupting logistics, or social unrest in response to inequality, businesses today are paying the price for ignoring the societal context in which they operate. For those in export-import—where interdependence, visibility, and velocity define competitive advantage—moral clarity is not just a compass. It’s a risk management tool. Embracing the social justice principles articulated by Pope Leo XIII is not about religious observance. It’s about recognising that every contract, every shipment, and every business decision takes place in a moral landscape. Companies that map that terrain wisely will build trust, attract capital, and sustain value in a turbulent century. Final Thought: The Long View Matters Pope Leo XIII understood that economic systems shape souls, not just markets. As ESG matures from a trend to a global standard, his insistence on dignity, justice, and moral economy becomes increasingly relevant. Businesses that embrace this long view—treating social responsibility as governance, not charity—will not only report better metrics. They’ll build more enduring, ethical, and ultimately profitable operations. Join Hi-Fella Today! As Pope Leo’s enduring emphasis on social justice gains renewed relevance in today’s ESG-driven business landscape, export-import companies must rise to the challenge of aligning profit with purpose. Hi-Fella supports this shift by connecting you with ethically aligned partners, offering transparency tools to enhance ESG reporting, and enabling responsible sourcing across global markets. Whether you're aiming to meet new governance standards or build a supply chain that reflects your values, Hi-Fella empowers you to trade responsibly while staying competitive in a world where ethics and economics go hand in hand.
Pope Leo’s Emphasis on Social Justice: Implications for Corporate Governance and ESG Reporting
Pope Leo XIII might not be the first name that comes to mind when thinking about supply chains, board...
Read More
UK Wildfires Highlight Climate Risks: What Businesses Should Consider
UK Wildfires Highlight Climate Risks: What Businesses Should Consider
Wildfires in the United Kingdom were once a statistical rarity, relegated to the heathlands and moorlands...
Philippines 2025 Elections: Implications for Foreign Investors and Trade Policies
Philippines 2025 Elections: Implications for Foreign Investors and Trade Policies
In May 2025, the Philippines will hold its midterm elections—a political event that may not grab global...