Hi-Fella Insights

What is The ILO? Get to Know the ILO as UN Agency for Workers 

The International Labour Organization (ILO) stands as a beacon of hope and progress for workers worldwide within the expansive framework of the United Nations. Established in 1919, this specialized agency of the UN has tirelessly championed the rights and well-being of laborers across the globe. With a rich history marked by milestones in workers’ rights, fair labor practices, and social justice, the ILO remains an indispensable force dedicated to ensuring that workers are not just beneficiaries, but active participants in shaping their working conditions and futures. Learn the ILO’s role in shaping fair labor practices worldwide. Explore its history, mission, and contributions to workers’ rights.

What is the ILO? The ILO acronym refers to the International Labour Organization. The ILO means an international organization that focuses on labor. Since its establishment in 1919, the International Labour Organization (ILO) stands as a unique entity within the United Nations framework. With its tripartite structure, the ILO serves as a platform where representatives from 187 Member States come together, representing the interests of governments, employers, and workers alike. Their collective mission revolves around the creation of labor standards, the formulation of policies, and the crafting of initiatives that strive to advance the cause of decent work for every individual, regardless of gender, within our global community.

The ILO was created back in 1919 as a part of the Treaty of Versailles that ended World War I to embrace the idea that enduring global peace hinges on the foundation of social justice. The Constitution of the ILO was drafted in the same year by the Labour Commission, chaired by Samuel Gompers, head of the American Federation of Labour (AFL) in the USA. Nine representative countries attended it. They are Belgium, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, France, Italy, Japan, Poland, the United Kingdom and the United States. The ILO was created as a unique organization, uniting government, employer, and worker representatives. It came into existence due to concerns about security, humanitarian issues, politics, and economics. The founders understood that promoting social justice was essential for maintaining peace, especially with the exploitation of workers during the industrialization era. They also recognized the importance of cooperation among nations to ensure fair working conditions in a competitive global market.

Fast forward to 1946, the ILO became a specialized agency of the United Nations. David Morse led the ILO from 1948 to 1970, overseeing its expansion as the number of member states doubled and it became universal. During this time, the organization also established important institutes, received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1969, and focused on labor standards. Wilfred Jenks continued this work from 1970 to 1973, particularly emphasizing freedom of association and the right to organize. Subsequent directors, like Francis Blanchard, expanded cooperation with developing countries. Michel Hansenne, who took over in 1989, stressed social justice and decentralized ILO activities. Juan Somavia, starting in 1999, prioritized decent work, poverty reduction, and the Millennium Development Goals. Guy Ryder, since 2012, has emphasized creating decent work for all and established the Global Commission on the Future of Work in 2019 to address changing work trends.

Throughout its history, the International Labour Organization has been a significant actor during critical moments in the world’s development. During the Great Depression, it helped with labor issues to deal with the economic crisis. When countries became independent from colonial rule, the ILO helped them create fair labor rules. In Poland, it supported the creation of Solidarność, which fought for workers’ rights. In South Africa, the ILO worked against apartheid to promote fairness. Today, it continues to make sure work is fair in a globalized world. So, the ILO has always been there to make sure people have good international working conditions and rights, no matter what’s happening in the world. One of the significant conventions established by the ILO is Employment Policy Convention, 1964 (No. 122) and its accompanying Recommendation, 1964 (No.122), the Employment Policy (Supplementary Provisions) Recommendation, 1984 (No.169). 

The International Labour Organization focuses on making the world more fair by promoting social justice and workers’ rights. They promote jobs and protect the people. It’s unique because it brings together governments, employers, and workers from 187 countries to create rules for good working conditions. Today, the ILO’s main goal, called the Decent Work agenda, is to improve the economy and work conditions for everyone. It has four key objectives: 

  1. Set and promote standards and fundamental principles and rights at work 
  2. Create greater opportunities for women and men to decent employment and income 
  3. Enhance the coverage and effectiveness of social protection for all 
  4. Strengthen tripartism and social dialogue 

For more than a hundred years, The ILO has created a big impact. It helps protect workers’ rights, make sure people are treated fairly at work, and boost economic growth. By setting these standards, it creates a more just and equal world where everyone can have decent work and better lives. For example when a pandemic hits the world in 2020, ILO pays great attention to the impact of the pandemic on the world of work. The key issue they focused on includes these one:

  1. ​Job closures and an increase in the global unemployment rate.
  2. Reduction of income of employers and workers. 
  3. Challenges to the health and safety of workers during the pandemic.
  4. Gaps in the recovery of the labor sector between countries and regions.
  5. Social protection of workers affected by the pandemic.

In summary, the International Labour Organization (ILO) is a special part of the United Nations that focuses on making sure workers have good rights and conditions everywhere. It joins governments, employers, and workers from many countries to make fair rules for work. The ILO’s main goal is to give all workers better jobs and protect their rights. This helps build a world where people are treated fairly, have good job opportunities, get social support, and where everyone work together for a better future. As a UN agency for workers, the ILO plays a crucial role in its mission to make sure fairness and peace go hand in hand.

About Author

Nadhifa Syafiera

Nadhifa Syafiera

Weaving realism and surrealism in a piece of paper with her quill.

Leave a Reply

Other Article

The Intersection of Religion and International Business: Understanding Pope Leo's Influence
The Intersection of Religion and International Business: Understanding Pope Leo's Influence
In today’s global marketplace, business decisions are shaped by a complex web of economic, political,...
Read More
Pope Leo’s Emphasis on Social Justice: Implications for Corporate Governance and ESG Reporting Pope Leo XIII might not be the first name that comes to mind when thinking about supply chains, board structures, or ESG metrics—but perhaps he should be. In 1891, with the encyclical Rerum Novarum, Pope Leo XIII became one of the earliest modern figures to articulate a systematic philosophy of social justice grounded in dignity, fairness, and responsibility within economic life. Over a century later, his message is finding surprising resonance in boardrooms, compliance frameworks, and ESG reports. As global businesses, particularly those operating across borders in the export-import arena, face mounting scrutiny over how they treat workers, engage communities, and protect the environment, the principles championed by Pope Leo offer more than ethical guidance. They offer a blueprint for long-term, resilient corporate governance. Revisiting Rerum Novarum: The Origins of Modern Social Doctrine Issued in response to the harsh conditions of the industrial revolution, Rerum Novarum—Latin for “Of New Things”—was Pope Leo XIII’s response to capitalism’s rapid evolution. The encyclical didn’t condemn free markets outright but warned against the dehumanisation of labour and unchecked industrial power. Its key tenets included: The right to private property, balanced by the obligation to use it responsibly. The dignity of labour and the necessity of a living wage. The importance of trade unions and collective bargaining. The role of the state in protecting vulnerable populations. A critique of both unregulated capitalism and radical socialism. In effect, Leo XIII laid out a social framework that prioritised human dignity over profit maximisation. And while this doctrine was originally written for a 19th-century Europe grappling with mechanisation and urban poverty, its philosophical architecture is highly relevant to today’s conversations on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards. From Papal Doctrine to ESG Standards: The Bridge ESG has become the de facto language for expressing how corporations manage risks and opportunities beyond traditional financial metrics. But at its core, ESG is about values translated into systems: how we treat people, how we steward resources, and how we design institutions to be accountable. In this context, Pope Leo’s teachings become not only compatible with ESG but foundational to it. Consider the thematic overlap: Social justice aligns with Social (S) in ESG, covering labour conditions, employee wellbeing, and equitable supply chains. Ethical use of property aligns with Governance (G), touching on shareholder responsibility, executive accountability, and ethical decision-making. Concern for the common good parallels Environmental (E) imperatives, especially the long-term view of sustainability and stewardship. This is particularly relevant for multinational export-import players who straddle jurisdictions, labour regimes, and supply chains that often include both highly regulated markets and vulnerable geographies. Corporate Governance: A New Moral Imperative Corporate governance is no longer just about fiduciary responsibility and compliance checklists. Boards are now expected to think critically about systemic risks—climate, inequality, supply chain fragility—and to embed values into business models. This is where Pope Leo’s influence becomes strategically significant. His emphasis on subsidiarity, a principle later elaborated in Catholic social teaching, holds that decisions should be made at the lowest competent level. Applied to corporate governance, this suggests empowering local suppliers, decentralising certain ESG strategies, and trusting community-rooted partners rather than imposing top-down mandates. For export-import firms, especially those operating in developing economies, this governance model encourages: Partnering with local stakeholders on environmental and social policies. Ensuring board diversity includes voices with on-the-ground operational or social insight. Establishing ethical trade committees that go beyond legal compliance into moral accountability. A good example comes from Unilever, which embedded sustainability goals directly into board oversight mechanisms, giving ESG performance equal weight to traditional financial KPIs. This approach reflects not just smart governance but the moral sensibility that Leo XIII envisioned—a business accountable not only to shareholders but to society at large. Social Justice in Supply Chains: From Ethics to Action One of Pope Leo’s most striking contributions was his insistence on a “living wage”—a concept that remains radical in many parts of the world. Today, the globalised supply chain continues to struggle with this legacy. From textile factories in Bangladesh to cobalt mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo, millions of workers form the backbone of export-import networks, yet live on precarious wages with minimal protections. ESG reporting frameworks such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) now require disclosure of workforce conditions, safety, gender pay gaps, and forced labour risk. These aren’t just regulatory pressures—they're extensions of the same ethical imperative Leo XIII articulated: the dignity of work and the rights of workers. For global firms, this means: Auditing suppliers for not only compliance but dignity—ensuring workers have safe conditions, fair pay, and voice mechanisms. Moving from reactive CSR donations to proactive value-chain transformation. Embracing long-term contracts with suppliers that reward ethical practices over lowest-cost bids. Apple, for instance, began publishing annual supply chain responsibility reports in the 2010s, and while not perfect, the move to public accountability mirrors the moral transparency that Pope Leo would consider essential in any economic structure. ESG Reporting: The Shift From Optics to Substance Pope Leo XIII warned against philanthropy as a substitute for justice. Today, businesses are often accused of “greenwashing” or “social-washing”—presenting ESG initiatives as branding exercises rather than embedded values. This is where his legacy offers a potent corrective. True ESG alignment demands that social impact is not confined to a side office in marketing, but woven into procurement strategies, capital allocation, and product development. To do this effectively, companies must move beyond disclosure to deliberation: What ethical lens do we use when selecting markets or partners? How are decisions about automation, relocation, or workforce reduction made—and who benefits? Does our ESG data reflect lived realities, or merely pass the materiality test? The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), set to impact over 50,000 companies by 2026, moves toward this deeper integration by requiring not just narrative sustainability reports, but auditable, standardised ESG data. Firms that fail to build internal ESG data systems now will face reputational and regulatory penalties soon. Investor Sentiment and Catholic Social Ethics Interestingly, investor behaviour is also converging with Leo XIII’s ethics. Impact investing, faith-based investing, and ESG screening are no longer niche. According to the Global Sustainable Investment Review, global sustainable investment reached $35.3 trillion in 2020, accounting for more than a third of total assets under management. Faith-aligned investment groups, including Catholic institutions managing multi-billion-dollar endowments, increasingly exclude companies that violate labour rights, degrade ecosystems, or operate in high-conflict zones. Pope Leo’s social vision now directly influences capital flows. Export-import players hoping to attract institutional investors must demonstrate more than quarterly earnings—they must articulate how their operations align with justice, stewardship, and human dignity. These are not soft values; they are becoming capital differentiators. The Strategic Advantage of Moral Clarity It’s tempting to see ESG as a chore, an imposition from regulators and activist investors. But Leo XIII saw something deeper: that systems built without moral clarity eventually become unstable. Whether it’s collapsing supply chains during a pandemic, extreme weather disrupting logistics, or social unrest in response to inequality, businesses today are paying the price for ignoring the societal context in which they operate. For those in export-import—where interdependence, visibility, and velocity define competitive advantage—moral clarity is not just a compass. It’s a risk management tool. Embracing the social justice principles articulated by Pope Leo XIII is not about religious observance. It’s about recognising that every contract, every shipment, and every business decision takes place in a moral landscape. Companies that map that terrain wisely will build trust, attract capital, and sustain value in a turbulent century. Final Thought: The Long View Matters Pope Leo XIII understood that economic systems shape souls, not just markets. As ESG matures from a trend to a global standard, his insistence on dignity, justice, and moral economy becomes increasingly relevant. Businesses that embrace this long view—treating social responsibility as governance, not charity—will not only report better metrics. They’ll build more enduring, ethical, and ultimately profitable operations. Join Hi-Fella Today! As Pope Leo’s enduring emphasis on social justice gains renewed relevance in today’s ESG-driven business landscape, export-import companies must rise to the challenge of aligning profit with purpose. Hi-Fella supports this shift by connecting you with ethically aligned partners, offering transparency tools to enhance ESG reporting, and enabling responsible sourcing across global markets. Whether you're aiming to meet new governance standards or build a supply chain that reflects your values, Hi-Fella empowers you to trade responsibly while staying competitive in a world where ethics and economics go hand in hand.
Pope Leo’s Emphasis on Social Justice: Implications for Corporate Governance and ESG Reporting
Pope Leo XIII might not be the first name that comes to mind when thinking about supply chains, board...
Read More
UK Wildfires Highlight Climate Risks: What Businesses Should Consider
UK Wildfires Highlight Climate Risks: What Businesses Should Consider
Wildfires in the United Kingdom were once a statistical rarity, relegated to the heathlands and moorlands...
Philippines 2025 Elections: Implications for Foreign Investors and Trade Policies
Philippines 2025 Elections: Implications for Foreign Investors and Trade Policies
In May 2025, the Philippines will hold its midterm elections—a political event that may not grab global...