Hi-Fella Insights

What are 3 Threats to the Future of Global Trade? An Explanation

If you want to enter the world of global trade, it’s crucial to ask, “What are the three threats to the future of global trade?” Because this is one of the ways you can better mitigate the risks that will happen in the future.

Therefore, in this article, we will know the answer to these critical questions, such as identifying and analyzing the key challenges that could significantly impact global economic interactions. So, without further do, let’s explore it together!

Why Understanding Global Trade Threats Matters

Threats to the Future of Global Trade

Understanding the threat of global trade is important for several reasons, including the following:

1. Economic Stability

Threats to global trade can trigger economic instability. For example, a global financial crisis or pandemic can disrupt trade flows, impacting GDP, employment, and investment in different countries. 

Being aware of these threats allows governments and businesses to take precautions and respond quickly when disruptions happen, minimizing the negative impact on the economy.

2. Business Adaptability

In the world of international business, understanding the various trade threats can help companies decide what strategies to implement in the future.

For example, identifying alternative markets, providing a more diverse supply chain, and developing products or services that can survive in various market conditions. This resilience is important to maintain market access and competitiveness in disruption.

3. Informed and Appropriate Decision-Making

By understanding the potential future threats to global trade, both individuals and investors can make more informed decisions regarding their personal finances, investments, and career paths. 

For example, investors may allocate their resources to sectors or regions with a lower risk of being impacted by global trade. 

This approach not only helps protect their investments but also takes advantage of potential opportunities in more stable markets.

By being aware of the various threats of global trade, individuals and investors can adjust their strategies to align themselves with these changes, thereby making wiser and more strategic financial and career decisions.

What are Three Threats to the Future of Global Trade? 

Understanding “What are the Three Threats to the Future of Global Trade?” becomes even more relevant when we look at the changing dynamics of global trade. Some of the key threats include the following:

1. Technological Disruptions

technological disruption in the threats to the future of global trade

One of the developments in international trade is the increasing role of digital technologies, such as the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), 3D printing, and blockchain.

These technologies are changing how trade is conducted, lowering trade costs, increasing efficiency, improving quality, and creating new products and services.

According to the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) 2018 World Trade Report, digital technologies can potentially increase global trade by 34% by 2030, especially in service trade. 

Moreover, digital technologies can change the composition of trade by increasing the share of services, facilitating trade in time-sensitive products, changing patterns of comparative advantage, and affecting the complexity and length of global value chains.

However, digitalization also brings several challenges to international trade, including privacy and security concerns, digital inequality, regulatory gaps and inconsistencies, and potential disruptions to labor markets and social security.

Therefore, international cooperation and coordination are needed to ensure inclusive, fair, and sustainable digital trade.

2. Geopolitical Tensions and Uncertainties

Geopolitical tensions and uncertainties in global trade

According to the IMF, the third phase of geopolitical pressures, which began with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, highlights new risks in international trade.

It represents one answer to the question, “What are the three threats to the future of global trade?” emphasizing the dangers of depending on a single country for imports of critical inputs. 

Examples such as Russia’s cut-off of gas supplies to Europe and the energy price spike show how dangerous it is to rely on a single external resource. 

This raises concerns about dependence on Russia and opens up questions about the potential risks of abrupt disconnections with countries like China.

Other examples, such as the United States banning the export of advanced technology to China, highlight this dynamic. The ban on the export of semiconductor technology, which has military applications, has also impacted civilian technology development. 

This change marks a turn from an era where trade, competition, and innovation are encouraged to one where the strongest economies seek not only to compete but also to restrict competitors.

In this context, forecasts about the future of global trade are highly speculative and highly dependent on policy choices. 

However, another possibility is that the world will split into rival camps, triggering a new cold war, this time between the US and China and their respective allies. Such a scenario could have severe consequences for global trade and international stability.

3. Sustainability

sustainability a challenge in global trade

The next challenge for global trade is the growing demand for sustainability. This means consumers, businesses, and governments are increasingly looking for ways to reduce the environmental and social impacts of trade. 

This trend is driven by growing awareness of climate change and other global challenges, consumer preferences for greener and ethical products and services, new regulations and standards regarding environmental and social performance, and emerging technologies. Greener products enable cleaner production and consumption.

According to a Standard Chartered (SCB) report, sustainability is becoming a key competitive advantage for companies in international trade.

SCB predicts that by 2030, sustainable goods could account for 25% of global trade flows, sustainable finance will support $1.5 trillion in cross-border financing annually, and sustainable supply chains could save $320 billion annually.

Sustainability can positively impact international trade by improving environmental quality and social welfare, driving innovation and productivity, creating new markets and jobs, and strengthening trust and reputation.

However, it can also pose several new challenges for international trade, such as increased compliance costs and risks, the creation of trade barriers or disruptions, the need for stakeholder coordination and cooperation, and the adaptation and transformation of business models. 

Therefore, sustainability should be integrated into international trade policies and practices, ensuring that trade contributes to global goals and values.

Conclusion

In the current era of changes in international trade, it is important to ask, “What are the Three Threats to the Future of Global Trade?” These challenges may include various aspects such as changes in trade patterns, dynamics, and impacts. 

Policymakers and business leaders must prepare for these changes, which bring not only challenges but also opportunities. 

Being prepared for the future of international trade involves a deep understanding of these trends, adaptation and innovation in strategies and operations, and collaboration with various parties, including competitors. 

This approach will enable us to maximize the potential of international trade in creating value and benefits for our country and the world as a whole.

Also, if you are an entrepreneur and want to scale your business globally, you can expand your business with Hi-Fella, the gateway to scale your import-export venture globally. 

With Hi-Fella, you can access a large network of over 7 million elite buyers and suppliers, coupled with a powerful World Trade Database. Take advantage and transform your international trade experience with us!

About Author

Silvia Stefani Chandra

Silvia Stefani Chandra

Leave a Reply

Other Article

The Intersection of Religion and International Business: Understanding Pope Leo's Influence
The Intersection of Religion and International Business: Understanding Pope Leo's Influence
In today’s global marketplace, business decisions are shaped by a complex web of economic, political,...
Read More
Pope Leo’s Emphasis on Social Justice: Implications for Corporate Governance and ESG Reporting Pope Leo XIII might not be the first name that comes to mind when thinking about supply chains, board structures, or ESG metrics—but perhaps he should be. In 1891, with the encyclical Rerum Novarum, Pope Leo XIII became one of the earliest modern figures to articulate a systematic philosophy of social justice grounded in dignity, fairness, and responsibility within economic life. Over a century later, his message is finding surprising resonance in boardrooms, compliance frameworks, and ESG reports. As global businesses, particularly those operating across borders in the export-import arena, face mounting scrutiny over how they treat workers, engage communities, and protect the environment, the principles championed by Pope Leo offer more than ethical guidance. They offer a blueprint for long-term, resilient corporate governance. Revisiting Rerum Novarum: The Origins of Modern Social Doctrine Issued in response to the harsh conditions of the industrial revolution, Rerum Novarum—Latin for “Of New Things”—was Pope Leo XIII’s response to capitalism’s rapid evolution. The encyclical didn’t condemn free markets outright but warned against the dehumanisation of labour and unchecked industrial power. Its key tenets included: The right to private property, balanced by the obligation to use it responsibly. The dignity of labour and the necessity of a living wage. The importance of trade unions and collective bargaining. The role of the state in protecting vulnerable populations. A critique of both unregulated capitalism and radical socialism. In effect, Leo XIII laid out a social framework that prioritised human dignity over profit maximisation. And while this doctrine was originally written for a 19th-century Europe grappling with mechanisation and urban poverty, its philosophical architecture is highly relevant to today’s conversations on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards. From Papal Doctrine to ESG Standards: The Bridge ESG has become the de facto language for expressing how corporations manage risks and opportunities beyond traditional financial metrics. But at its core, ESG is about values translated into systems: how we treat people, how we steward resources, and how we design institutions to be accountable. In this context, Pope Leo’s teachings become not only compatible with ESG but foundational to it. Consider the thematic overlap: Social justice aligns with Social (S) in ESG, covering labour conditions, employee wellbeing, and equitable supply chains. Ethical use of property aligns with Governance (G), touching on shareholder responsibility, executive accountability, and ethical decision-making. Concern for the common good parallels Environmental (E) imperatives, especially the long-term view of sustainability and stewardship. This is particularly relevant for multinational export-import players who straddle jurisdictions, labour regimes, and supply chains that often include both highly regulated markets and vulnerable geographies. Corporate Governance: A New Moral Imperative Corporate governance is no longer just about fiduciary responsibility and compliance checklists. Boards are now expected to think critically about systemic risks—climate, inequality, supply chain fragility—and to embed values into business models. This is where Pope Leo’s influence becomes strategically significant. His emphasis on subsidiarity, a principle later elaborated in Catholic social teaching, holds that decisions should be made at the lowest competent level. Applied to corporate governance, this suggests empowering local suppliers, decentralising certain ESG strategies, and trusting community-rooted partners rather than imposing top-down mandates. For export-import firms, especially those operating in developing economies, this governance model encourages: Partnering with local stakeholders on environmental and social policies. Ensuring board diversity includes voices with on-the-ground operational or social insight. Establishing ethical trade committees that go beyond legal compliance into moral accountability. A good example comes from Unilever, which embedded sustainability goals directly into board oversight mechanisms, giving ESG performance equal weight to traditional financial KPIs. This approach reflects not just smart governance but the moral sensibility that Leo XIII envisioned—a business accountable not only to shareholders but to society at large. Social Justice in Supply Chains: From Ethics to Action One of Pope Leo’s most striking contributions was his insistence on a “living wage”—a concept that remains radical in many parts of the world. Today, the globalised supply chain continues to struggle with this legacy. From textile factories in Bangladesh to cobalt mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo, millions of workers form the backbone of export-import networks, yet live on precarious wages with minimal protections. ESG reporting frameworks such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) now require disclosure of workforce conditions, safety, gender pay gaps, and forced labour risk. These aren’t just regulatory pressures—they're extensions of the same ethical imperative Leo XIII articulated: the dignity of work and the rights of workers. For global firms, this means: Auditing suppliers for not only compliance but dignity—ensuring workers have safe conditions, fair pay, and voice mechanisms. Moving from reactive CSR donations to proactive value-chain transformation. Embracing long-term contracts with suppliers that reward ethical practices over lowest-cost bids. Apple, for instance, began publishing annual supply chain responsibility reports in the 2010s, and while not perfect, the move to public accountability mirrors the moral transparency that Pope Leo would consider essential in any economic structure. ESG Reporting: The Shift From Optics to Substance Pope Leo XIII warned against philanthropy as a substitute for justice. Today, businesses are often accused of “greenwashing” or “social-washing”—presenting ESG initiatives as branding exercises rather than embedded values. This is where his legacy offers a potent corrective. True ESG alignment demands that social impact is not confined to a side office in marketing, but woven into procurement strategies, capital allocation, and product development. To do this effectively, companies must move beyond disclosure to deliberation: What ethical lens do we use when selecting markets or partners? How are decisions about automation, relocation, or workforce reduction made—and who benefits? Does our ESG data reflect lived realities, or merely pass the materiality test? The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), set to impact over 50,000 companies by 2026, moves toward this deeper integration by requiring not just narrative sustainability reports, but auditable, standardised ESG data. Firms that fail to build internal ESG data systems now will face reputational and regulatory penalties soon. Investor Sentiment and Catholic Social Ethics Interestingly, investor behaviour is also converging with Leo XIII’s ethics. Impact investing, faith-based investing, and ESG screening are no longer niche. According to the Global Sustainable Investment Review, global sustainable investment reached $35.3 trillion in 2020, accounting for more than a third of total assets under management. Faith-aligned investment groups, including Catholic institutions managing multi-billion-dollar endowments, increasingly exclude companies that violate labour rights, degrade ecosystems, or operate in high-conflict zones. Pope Leo’s social vision now directly influences capital flows. Export-import players hoping to attract institutional investors must demonstrate more than quarterly earnings—they must articulate how their operations align with justice, stewardship, and human dignity. These are not soft values; they are becoming capital differentiators. The Strategic Advantage of Moral Clarity It’s tempting to see ESG as a chore, an imposition from regulators and activist investors. But Leo XIII saw something deeper: that systems built without moral clarity eventually become unstable. Whether it’s collapsing supply chains during a pandemic, extreme weather disrupting logistics, or social unrest in response to inequality, businesses today are paying the price for ignoring the societal context in which they operate. For those in export-import—where interdependence, visibility, and velocity define competitive advantage—moral clarity is not just a compass. It’s a risk management tool. Embracing the social justice principles articulated by Pope Leo XIII is not about religious observance. It’s about recognising that every contract, every shipment, and every business decision takes place in a moral landscape. Companies that map that terrain wisely will build trust, attract capital, and sustain value in a turbulent century. Final Thought: The Long View Matters Pope Leo XIII understood that economic systems shape souls, not just markets. As ESG matures from a trend to a global standard, his insistence on dignity, justice, and moral economy becomes increasingly relevant. Businesses that embrace this long view—treating social responsibility as governance, not charity—will not only report better metrics. They’ll build more enduring, ethical, and ultimately profitable operations. Join Hi-Fella Today! As Pope Leo’s enduring emphasis on social justice gains renewed relevance in today’s ESG-driven business landscape, export-import companies must rise to the challenge of aligning profit with purpose. Hi-Fella supports this shift by connecting you with ethically aligned partners, offering transparency tools to enhance ESG reporting, and enabling responsible sourcing across global markets. Whether you're aiming to meet new governance standards or build a supply chain that reflects your values, Hi-Fella empowers you to trade responsibly while staying competitive in a world where ethics and economics go hand in hand.
Pope Leo’s Emphasis on Social Justice: Implications for Corporate Governance and ESG Reporting
Pope Leo XIII might not be the first name that comes to mind when thinking about supply chains, board...
Read More
UK Wildfires Highlight Climate Risks: What Businesses Should Consider
UK Wildfires Highlight Climate Risks: What Businesses Should Consider
Wildfires in the United Kingdom were once a statistical rarity, relegated to the heathlands and moorlands...
Philippines 2025 Elections: Implications for Foreign Investors and Trade Policies
Philippines 2025 Elections: Implications for Foreign Investors and Trade Policies
In May 2025, the Philippines will hold its midterm elections—a political event that may not grab global...