Hi-Fella Insights

Principle 7 of Economics - Organize Economic Activity

Principle 7 of economy is a compass that guides us through the intricate path of wealth creation, providing insights into the intricate interplay of variables that determine a nation’s economic fate. 

In this article, we will navigate through the fundamental ideas encapsulated within principle, understanding how it shapes economic policies and influences the well-being of societies on a global scale.

What is Principle 7 of Microeconomics?

Principle 7 of microeconomics states that markets use the forces of supply and demand to allocate resources. 

Supply refers to the quantity of goods or services that producers are willing to sell at a given price. 

Demand refers to the quantity of goods or services that consumers are willing to buy at a given price.

The price of a good or service is determined by the intersection of supply and demand. When supply is greater than demand, the price will fall. When demand is greater than supply, the price will rise. 

This process of price adjustment ensures that resources are allocated to the production of goods and services that are most desired by consumers.

How Markets Harness the Forces of Supply and Demand for Resource Allocation

Markets are a decentralized way of allocating resources. This means that there is no central planner who decides what goods and services to produce and how much to produce of each. 

Instead, individual producers and consumers make their own decisions based on their own self-interest.

Producers will produce goods and services that they expect to be able to sell at a profit. Consumers will buy goods and services that they value more than the price they are willing to pay.

The forces of supply and demand work together to ensure that resources are allocated to the production of goods and services that are in highest demand. 

If a good or service is not in demand, its price will fall, and producers will stop producing it. If a good or service is in high demand, its price will rise, and producers will produce more of it.

Markets are not always perfect. There can be information asymmetries, where producers have more information about a good or service than consumers. 

There can also be externalities, where the production or consumption of a good or service affects people who are not directly involved in the transaction.

Despite these imperfections, markets are generally a more efficient way of allocating resources than central planning. 

This is because markets are more responsive to the needs of consumers and because they allow for innovation and experimentation.

Market Structures and Resource Allocation

The principle 7 of economy has a market structure in some aspects. 

Here is the explanation about the perfect competition, the monopolies, its imperfect competition and what things are impacted by those market structures. 

Perfect Competition

Perfect competition is a theoretical market structure characterized by numerous firms selling identical products, free entry and exit of firms, perfect information available to all participants, and no barriers to entry or exit. 

In this ideal setting, the forces of supply and demand determine the market price, and all firms are price takers, meaning they have no influence over the market price.

Under perfect competition, resource allocation is considered efficient because firms are motivated to produce the output level where marginal cost equals marginal revenue, ensuring that resources are used to produce the most desired goods and services for consumers. 

Additionally, the low barriers to entry and exit promote competition, preventing any single firm from dominating the market and distorting resource allocation.

Monopoly

A monopoly is a market structure with a single firm selling a unique product, where there is no close substitute and there are barriers to entry. 

The monopolist has significant control over the market price and output level, as it faces no competition.

In a monopoly, resource allocation is often considered inefficient due to the lack of competition. 

The monopolist may restrict output to maintain higher prices, leading to underutilization of resources and reduced consumer welfare. 

Additionally, the lack of competition may stifle innovation and product development.

Imperfect Competition

Imperfect competition encompasses market structures that do not exhibit the characteristics of perfect competition or monopoly. Examples include monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopsony. 

In these structures, the forces of supply and demand still influence resource allocation, but the degree of efficiency varies depending on the specific market characteristics.

  • Monopolistic competition is characterized by many firms selling differentiated products. Firms have some degree of market power, but they also face competition from other firms. Resource allocation in monopolistic competition is less efficient than in perfect competition, but it is more efficient than in monopoly.
  • Oligopoly is characterized by a few firms selling a product. Firms have significant market power, and they can influence the market price. Resource allocation in oligopoly is less efficient than in perfect competition or monopolistic competition, but it is more efficient than in monopoly.
  • Monopsony is a market structure with a single buyer of a product. The monopsonist has significant market power, and it can influence the price at which it buys the product. Resource allocation in a monopsony is less efficient than in other market structures, as the monopsonist can drive down the price of the product and reduce the incentive for firms to produce it.

Case Study: The Development of the Smartphone

In the early 2000s, smartphones were still a relatively new invention. They were expensive and had limited features. 

However, as demand for smartphones grew, so did competition among technology companies to develop better and more affordable smartphones.

As a result of this competition, the price of smartphones fell dramatically, and the quality of smartphones increased significantly. 

Today, smartphones are ubiquitous and affordable, and they offer a wide range of features and capabilities.

The development of the smartphone is a great example of how the forces of supply and demand can lead to innovation and efficiency. 

Consumer demand for smartphones drove technology companies to develop better and more affordable products. 

As a result, consumers now have access to a wide range of high-quality smartphones at competitive prices.

Principle 7 of economy is a powerful force in the technology sector. It drives technology companies to innovate and develop new products and services that meet the needs of consumers. 

As a result, consumers have access to a wide range of high-quality technology products and services at competitive prices.

The forces of supply and demand are constantly interacting and evolving, and they play a vital role in shaping the global economy. 

By understanding how these forces work, businesses and individuals can make better decisions about how to allocate their resources.

If you are interested in mastering the principles of economics and diving into the real world of business and finance, Hi-fella can help. 

Hi-fella is a comprehensive online learning platform that offers a variety of courses and resources on a wide range of economic topics.

About Author

El Syafira Saragih

El Syafira Saragih

Leave a Reply

Other Article

The Intersection of Religion and International Business: Understanding Pope Leo's Influence
The Intersection of Religion and International Business: Understanding Pope Leo's Influence
In today’s global marketplace, business decisions are shaped by a complex web of economic, political,...
Read More
Pope Leo’s Emphasis on Social Justice: Implications for Corporate Governance and ESG Reporting Pope Leo XIII might not be the first name that comes to mind when thinking about supply chains, board structures, or ESG metrics—but perhaps he should be. In 1891, with the encyclical Rerum Novarum, Pope Leo XIII became one of the earliest modern figures to articulate a systematic philosophy of social justice grounded in dignity, fairness, and responsibility within economic life. Over a century later, his message is finding surprising resonance in boardrooms, compliance frameworks, and ESG reports. As global businesses, particularly those operating across borders in the export-import arena, face mounting scrutiny over how they treat workers, engage communities, and protect the environment, the principles championed by Pope Leo offer more than ethical guidance. They offer a blueprint for long-term, resilient corporate governance. Revisiting Rerum Novarum: The Origins of Modern Social Doctrine Issued in response to the harsh conditions of the industrial revolution, Rerum Novarum—Latin for “Of New Things”—was Pope Leo XIII’s response to capitalism’s rapid evolution. The encyclical didn’t condemn free markets outright but warned against the dehumanisation of labour and unchecked industrial power. Its key tenets included: The right to private property, balanced by the obligation to use it responsibly. The dignity of labour and the necessity of a living wage. The importance of trade unions and collective bargaining. The role of the state in protecting vulnerable populations. A critique of both unregulated capitalism and radical socialism. In effect, Leo XIII laid out a social framework that prioritised human dignity over profit maximisation. And while this doctrine was originally written for a 19th-century Europe grappling with mechanisation and urban poverty, its philosophical architecture is highly relevant to today’s conversations on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards. From Papal Doctrine to ESG Standards: The Bridge ESG has become the de facto language for expressing how corporations manage risks and opportunities beyond traditional financial metrics. But at its core, ESG is about values translated into systems: how we treat people, how we steward resources, and how we design institutions to be accountable. In this context, Pope Leo’s teachings become not only compatible with ESG but foundational to it. Consider the thematic overlap: Social justice aligns with Social (S) in ESG, covering labour conditions, employee wellbeing, and equitable supply chains. Ethical use of property aligns with Governance (G), touching on shareholder responsibility, executive accountability, and ethical decision-making. Concern for the common good parallels Environmental (E) imperatives, especially the long-term view of sustainability and stewardship. This is particularly relevant for multinational export-import players who straddle jurisdictions, labour regimes, and supply chains that often include both highly regulated markets and vulnerable geographies. Corporate Governance: A New Moral Imperative Corporate governance is no longer just about fiduciary responsibility and compliance checklists. Boards are now expected to think critically about systemic risks—climate, inequality, supply chain fragility—and to embed values into business models. This is where Pope Leo’s influence becomes strategically significant. His emphasis on subsidiarity, a principle later elaborated in Catholic social teaching, holds that decisions should be made at the lowest competent level. Applied to corporate governance, this suggests empowering local suppliers, decentralising certain ESG strategies, and trusting community-rooted partners rather than imposing top-down mandates. For export-import firms, especially those operating in developing economies, this governance model encourages: Partnering with local stakeholders on environmental and social policies. Ensuring board diversity includes voices with on-the-ground operational or social insight. Establishing ethical trade committees that go beyond legal compliance into moral accountability. A good example comes from Unilever, which embedded sustainability goals directly into board oversight mechanisms, giving ESG performance equal weight to traditional financial KPIs. This approach reflects not just smart governance but the moral sensibility that Leo XIII envisioned—a business accountable not only to shareholders but to society at large. Social Justice in Supply Chains: From Ethics to Action One of Pope Leo’s most striking contributions was his insistence on a “living wage”—a concept that remains radical in many parts of the world. Today, the globalised supply chain continues to struggle with this legacy. From textile factories in Bangladesh to cobalt mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo, millions of workers form the backbone of export-import networks, yet live on precarious wages with minimal protections. ESG reporting frameworks such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) now require disclosure of workforce conditions, safety, gender pay gaps, and forced labour risk. These aren’t just regulatory pressures—they're extensions of the same ethical imperative Leo XIII articulated: the dignity of work and the rights of workers. For global firms, this means: Auditing suppliers for not only compliance but dignity—ensuring workers have safe conditions, fair pay, and voice mechanisms. Moving from reactive CSR donations to proactive value-chain transformation. Embracing long-term contracts with suppliers that reward ethical practices over lowest-cost bids. Apple, for instance, began publishing annual supply chain responsibility reports in the 2010s, and while not perfect, the move to public accountability mirrors the moral transparency that Pope Leo would consider essential in any economic structure. ESG Reporting: The Shift From Optics to Substance Pope Leo XIII warned against philanthropy as a substitute for justice. Today, businesses are often accused of “greenwashing” or “social-washing”—presenting ESG initiatives as branding exercises rather than embedded values. This is where his legacy offers a potent corrective. True ESG alignment demands that social impact is not confined to a side office in marketing, but woven into procurement strategies, capital allocation, and product development. To do this effectively, companies must move beyond disclosure to deliberation: What ethical lens do we use when selecting markets or partners? How are decisions about automation, relocation, or workforce reduction made—and who benefits? Does our ESG data reflect lived realities, or merely pass the materiality test? The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), set to impact over 50,000 companies by 2026, moves toward this deeper integration by requiring not just narrative sustainability reports, but auditable, standardised ESG data. Firms that fail to build internal ESG data systems now will face reputational and regulatory penalties soon. Investor Sentiment and Catholic Social Ethics Interestingly, investor behaviour is also converging with Leo XIII’s ethics. Impact investing, faith-based investing, and ESG screening are no longer niche. According to the Global Sustainable Investment Review, global sustainable investment reached $35.3 trillion in 2020, accounting for more than a third of total assets under management. Faith-aligned investment groups, including Catholic institutions managing multi-billion-dollar endowments, increasingly exclude companies that violate labour rights, degrade ecosystems, or operate in high-conflict zones. Pope Leo’s social vision now directly influences capital flows. Export-import players hoping to attract institutional investors must demonstrate more than quarterly earnings—they must articulate how their operations align with justice, stewardship, and human dignity. These are not soft values; they are becoming capital differentiators. The Strategic Advantage of Moral Clarity It’s tempting to see ESG as a chore, an imposition from regulators and activist investors. But Leo XIII saw something deeper: that systems built without moral clarity eventually become unstable. Whether it’s collapsing supply chains during a pandemic, extreme weather disrupting logistics, or social unrest in response to inequality, businesses today are paying the price for ignoring the societal context in which they operate. For those in export-import—where interdependence, visibility, and velocity define competitive advantage—moral clarity is not just a compass. It’s a risk management tool. Embracing the social justice principles articulated by Pope Leo XIII is not about religious observance. It’s about recognising that every contract, every shipment, and every business decision takes place in a moral landscape. Companies that map that terrain wisely will build trust, attract capital, and sustain value in a turbulent century. Final Thought: The Long View Matters Pope Leo XIII understood that economic systems shape souls, not just markets. As ESG matures from a trend to a global standard, his insistence on dignity, justice, and moral economy becomes increasingly relevant. Businesses that embrace this long view—treating social responsibility as governance, not charity—will not only report better metrics. They’ll build more enduring, ethical, and ultimately profitable operations. Join Hi-Fella Today! As Pope Leo’s enduring emphasis on social justice gains renewed relevance in today’s ESG-driven business landscape, export-import companies must rise to the challenge of aligning profit with purpose. Hi-Fella supports this shift by connecting you with ethically aligned partners, offering transparency tools to enhance ESG reporting, and enabling responsible sourcing across global markets. Whether you're aiming to meet new governance standards or build a supply chain that reflects your values, Hi-Fella empowers you to trade responsibly while staying competitive in a world where ethics and economics go hand in hand.
Pope Leo’s Emphasis on Social Justice: Implications for Corporate Governance and ESG Reporting
Pope Leo XIII might not be the first name that comes to mind when thinking about supply chains, board...
Read More
UK Wildfires Highlight Climate Risks: What Businesses Should Consider
UK Wildfires Highlight Climate Risks: What Businesses Should Consider
Wildfires in the United Kingdom were once a statistical rarity, relegated to the heathlands and moorlands...
Philippines 2025 Elections: Implications for Foreign Investors and Trade Policies
Philippines 2025 Elections: Implications for Foreign Investors and Trade Policies
In May 2025, the Philippines will hold its midterm elections—a political event that may not grab global...