Hi-Fella Insights

Exploring Energy Commodities: Trends, Investments, and Global Impact

In this article, we will provide an overview of the major energy commodities, a list of energy commodities, future market trends, and investment opportunities in this field. So, let’s dive into this article!

What is Energy Commodities?

According to Law Insider, the definition of energy commodities includes electricity, green power, natural gas, methane, and various petroleum-based fuels. 

This includes but is not limited to diesel, bio-diesel, unleaded fuel, fuel oil, propane, and other bulk commodities mostly used by the City to heat and cool buildings, power generation, cogeneration, and fuel the City’s fleet. 

Overview of Major Energy Commodities

a picture of energy commodities factory

Source: Norgiis Group

Energy significantly impacts our daily lives, affecting the cost of almost everything we use, from groceries and clothing to electronic devices and car fuel. 

Energy is important in determining the costs associated with heating and cooling homes, businesses, and other essential buildings. 

According to the US Energy Information Agency (EIA), global energy consumption exceeds 125 quadrillion Btu annually and is projected to reach 138 quadrillion Btu by 2050.

The massive scale of this energy commodity becomes even more obvious when we compare it to fossil fuel consumption in the world’s largest economy.

List of Energy Commodities 

list of energy commodities

The list of energy commodities covers many essential resources that power our modern world. Here are some of the key components of the energy commodities list: 

1. Crude Oil

Commonly known as “black gold,” crude oil is a vital energy source and an essential ingredient in the manufacture of various everyday goods. 

Crude oil is the base material for producing fuels such as gasoline and diesel. It acts as the raw material for the petrochemical industry, producing plastics, chemicals, and other essential materials.

Crude Oil Production Trend

The price and accessibility of crude oil exert an important impact on the economic and geopolitical landscape. 

According to Enerdata, In 2022, global crude oil production jumped more than 5%, surpassing both 2021 growth and the 2010-2019 average. This increase is driven by economic growth and OPEC+ gradually adjusting production. 

The Middle East, North America, and Latin America saw significant production increases, while Africa, Asia, and Europe saw oil production decline. 

Despite facing sanctions, Russia managed to increase production by 2.1%. Notable increases occurred in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and Iran, while Nigeria experienced a significant decline in production.

Global Crude Oil Demand

demand for crude oil worldwide data

According to Statista, global crude oil demand in 2022 is 99.57 million barrels per day, which will increase to 101.89 million barrels per day in 2023. 

The decrease in 2020 is a result of the economic and mobility impacts of the pandemic. Compared to the 2010 daily demand of 84.8 million barrels, the upward trend in demand over the past decade is still evident.

2. Natural Gas

Natural gas is categorized as a fossil fuel energy source consisting of various compounds. The main component is methane, which consists of one carbon atom and four hydrogen atoms (CH4).

In addition, natural gas contains small amounts of natural gas liquids (NGLs), which are considered hydrocarbon gas liquids, along with non-hydrocarbon gasses such as carbon dioxide and water vapour. 

Natural Gas Production Trend 

According to Enerdata, after rebounding in 2021, global gas production remained stable in 2022. Despite lower demand, production increased globally, with production declines in Russia offset by production increases in North America, the Middle East, China, and Australia. 

However, Russia still saw a 12% decline due to reduced exports to Europe, which contributed to a 7.6% decline in EU gas production. Brazil also saw decreases in gas production because of the collapse.

Meanwhile, gas production continued to increase in North America, China, Australia, the Middle East, and Latin America, driven by various factors, including the Vaca Muerta field in Argentina and projects in Mexico. 

Global Natural Gas Demand

demand for crude oil worldwide with a forecast

Based on the Statista, by 2050, it is estimated that Asia Pacific will use the most natural gas. In 2021, North America used the most, about one trillion cubic meters (tcm). 

However, this is expected to shift as natural gas use in the Asia Pacific is expected to rise from 915 billion cubic meters in 2021 to 1.6 tcm in 2050. Europe is the only place where natural gas demand is expected to continue to fall in the coming years.

3. Coal

Coal is a fossil fuel originating from dead plant material trapped between rock layers. Over millions of years, it transforms into peat and progresses to lignite, sub-bituminous coal, and anthracite coal. 

Historically crucial for energy, cavemen used it for heating. During the Industrial Revolution, coal’s use surged to meet growing energy demands. Today, it continues to significantly contribute to the global energy supply and plays a vital role in various industries.

Coal Production Trend

world total coal production

Global coal production decreased by 4.8% in 2020, marking a reversal after three consecutive years of growth. China was the only major producing country to experience an increase in coal production, up by 1.1% over the same period. 

The ongoing decline in coal production, observed since the beginning of the century, continued in the United States and the European Union, with significant decreases in Germany, Poland, and Greece. 

Additionally, previously rising production in Russia, Indonesia, India, and Turkey has already peaked and is now on a downward trend.

Global Coal Demand

predictions for energy commodities such as global coal consumption

By 2022, soaring natural gas prices are driving a shift towards the more cost-effective energy commodity of coal, with global demand expected to grow 1.2% to more than 8 billion metric tons. 

Despite the economic challenges of these rising energy commodity prices, coal use for electricity is expected to increase by 2%, while industrial consumption declines by more than 1%. 

Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the IEA predicts global coal demand will reach 8 billion metric tons by 2025, with China leading the way with 53% of coal consumption. 

The IEA forecasts 0.7% annual growth for coal consumption in China through 2025, driven by increased reliance on renewable energy. 

India’s doubling of coal consumption since 2007 supports global demand, and in Europe, challenges in hydro and nuclear power generation are leading to an increase in coal-fired power generation.

4. Electricity

Electricity is generated through a process that results in the movement of electrical power or charge. It occurs naturally and is one of the most common forms of energy worldwide. 

Awareness of electricity dates back thousands of years, with ancient societies being fascinated by electric fish and the observation of static electricity through the friction of objects.

Electricity Production Trend

electricity production trends in the energy commodity field

Global power generation increased by 2.3% in 2022, aligning with the 2010-2019 average growth of +2.5% after a 5.7% rebound in 2021. China, India, and the United States drove growth, along with notable increases in Indonesia and Saudi Arabia. 

Other regions, including South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Japan, Latin America, Canada, and Australia, also grew. 

In Africa, power generation was stable, with growth in Algeria and Egypt offsetting declines in South Africa. 

In contrast, Europe saw a 2.8% decline, with a 15% drop in France, offset by increased output in Spain and the UK. The war led to a more than 27% decline in power generation in Ukraine, while Russian power generation remained stable.

Global Electricity Demand

electricity demand by region

Despite challenges stemming from the global energy crisis triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, global electricity demand growth only slightly slowed in 2022. 

According to IEA, demand increased by almost 2%, slightly below the average growth rate of 2.4% observed from 2015 to 2019. 

The global trend to electrify the transportation and heating sectors continues to gain momentum, with surging sales of electric vehicles and heat pumps contributing to growth.

In contrast, electricity consumption in the European Union saw a significant decline of 3.5% year-on-year by 2022, mainly due to the region’s struggle with high energy prices, resulting in a substantial drop in demand among industrial consumers. 

Meanwhile, India and the United States experienced an increase in electricity demand, while China’s growth was affected by COVID-19 restrictions.

Investment Opportunities in Energy Commodities

Did you know that investors looking to diversify beyond stocks and bonds often turn to commodities? Here is why:

Reasons to Invest in Energy Commodities

  • Diversification
    Including energy commodities in a portfolio provides diversification beyond traditional assets like stocks and bonds. Energy markets often have different risk factors and market dynamics, which helps spread risk.
  • Global Demand
    Energy commodities, such as crude oil and natural gas, are critical to global economic activity. Investments in energy can align with consistent demand for these resources around the world.
  • Inflation Hedging
    Energy prices are often correlated with inflation. As inflation rises, energy commodity prices can increase, offering a potential hedge against the impact of inflation eroding purchasing power.
  • Geopolitical Events
    Global events, such as geopolitical tensions or conflicts in major oil-producing regions, can significantly affect energy prices. Investors may find opportunities to capitalize on price fluctuations resulting from geopolitical developments.

Investors should consider their risk tolerance and objectives, understanding the dynamic nature of commodity markets before including them in their portfolio.

About Author

Silvia Stefani Chandra

Silvia Stefani Chandra

Leave a Reply

Other Article

The Intersection of Religion and International Business: Understanding Pope Leo's Influence
The Intersection of Religion and International Business: Understanding Pope Leo's Influence
In today’s global marketplace, business decisions are shaped by a complex web of economic, political,...
Read More
Pope Leo’s Emphasis on Social Justice: Implications for Corporate Governance and ESG Reporting Pope Leo XIII might not be the first name that comes to mind when thinking about supply chains, board structures, or ESG metrics—but perhaps he should be. In 1891, with the encyclical Rerum Novarum, Pope Leo XIII became one of the earliest modern figures to articulate a systematic philosophy of social justice grounded in dignity, fairness, and responsibility within economic life. Over a century later, his message is finding surprising resonance in boardrooms, compliance frameworks, and ESG reports. As global businesses, particularly those operating across borders in the export-import arena, face mounting scrutiny over how they treat workers, engage communities, and protect the environment, the principles championed by Pope Leo offer more than ethical guidance. They offer a blueprint for long-term, resilient corporate governance. Revisiting Rerum Novarum: The Origins of Modern Social Doctrine Issued in response to the harsh conditions of the industrial revolution, Rerum Novarum—Latin for “Of New Things”—was Pope Leo XIII’s response to capitalism’s rapid evolution. The encyclical didn’t condemn free markets outright but warned against the dehumanisation of labour and unchecked industrial power. Its key tenets included: The right to private property, balanced by the obligation to use it responsibly. The dignity of labour and the necessity of a living wage. The importance of trade unions and collective bargaining. The role of the state in protecting vulnerable populations. A critique of both unregulated capitalism and radical socialism. In effect, Leo XIII laid out a social framework that prioritised human dignity over profit maximisation. And while this doctrine was originally written for a 19th-century Europe grappling with mechanisation and urban poverty, its philosophical architecture is highly relevant to today’s conversations on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards. From Papal Doctrine to ESG Standards: The Bridge ESG has become the de facto language for expressing how corporations manage risks and opportunities beyond traditional financial metrics. But at its core, ESG is about values translated into systems: how we treat people, how we steward resources, and how we design institutions to be accountable. In this context, Pope Leo’s teachings become not only compatible with ESG but foundational to it. Consider the thematic overlap: Social justice aligns with Social (S) in ESG, covering labour conditions, employee wellbeing, and equitable supply chains. Ethical use of property aligns with Governance (G), touching on shareholder responsibility, executive accountability, and ethical decision-making. Concern for the common good parallels Environmental (E) imperatives, especially the long-term view of sustainability and stewardship. This is particularly relevant for multinational export-import players who straddle jurisdictions, labour regimes, and supply chains that often include both highly regulated markets and vulnerable geographies. Corporate Governance: A New Moral Imperative Corporate governance is no longer just about fiduciary responsibility and compliance checklists. Boards are now expected to think critically about systemic risks—climate, inequality, supply chain fragility—and to embed values into business models. This is where Pope Leo’s influence becomes strategically significant. His emphasis on subsidiarity, a principle later elaborated in Catholic social teaching, holds that decisions should be made at the lowest competent level. Applied to corporate governance, this suggests empowering local suppliers, decentralising certain ESG strategies, and trusting community-rooted partners rather than imposing top-down mandates. For export-import firms, especially those operating in developing economies, this governance model encourages: Partnering with local stakeholders on environmental and social policies. Ensuring board diversity includes voices with on-the-ground operational or social insight. Establishing ethical trade committees that go beyond legal compliance into moral accountability. A good example comes from Unilever, which embedded sustainability goals directly into board oversight mechanisms, giving ESG performance equal weight to traditional financial KPIs. This approach reflects not just smart governance but the moral sensibility that Leo XIII envisioned—a business accountable not only to shareholders but to society at large. Social Justice in Supply Chains: From Ethics to Action One of Pope Leo’s most striking contributions was his insistence on a “living wage”—a concept that remains radical in many parts of the world. Today, the globalised supply chain continues to struggle with this legacy. From textile factories in Bangladesh to cobalt mines in the Democratic Republic of Congo, millions of workers form the backbone of export-import networks, yet live on precarious wages with minimal protections. ESG reporting frameworks such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) now require disclosure of workforce conditions, safety, gender pay gaps, and forced labour risk. These aren’t just regulatory pressures—they're extensions of the same ethical imperative Leo XIII articulated: the dignity of work and the rights of workers. For global firms, this means: Auditing suppliers for not only compliance but dignity—ensuring workers have safe conditions, fair pay, and voice mechanisms. Moving from reactive CSR donations to proactive value-chain transformation. Embracing long-term contracts with suppliers that reward ethical practices over lowest-cost bids. Apple, for instance, began publishing annual supply chain responsibility reports in the 2010s, and while not perfect, the move to public accountability mirrors the moral transparency that Pope Leo would consider essential in any economic structure. ESG Reporting: The Shift From Optics to Substance Pope Leo XIII warned against philanthropy as a substitute for justice. Today, businesses are often accused of “greenwashing” or “social-washing”—presenting ESG initiatives as branding exercises rather than embedded values. This is where his legacy offers a potent corrective. True ESG alignment demands that social impact is not confined to a side office in marketing, but woven into procurement strategies, capital allocation, and product development. To do this effectively, companies must move beyond disclosure to deliberation: What ethical lens do we use when selecting markets or partners? How are decisions about automation, relocation, or workforce reduction made—and who benefits? Does our ESG data reflect lived realities, or merely pass the materiality test? The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), set to impact over 50,000 companies by 2026, moves toward this deeper integration by requiring not just narrative sustainability reports, but auditable, standardised ESG data. Firms that fail to build internal ESG data systems now will face reputational and regulatory penalties soon. Investor Sentiment and Catholic Social Ethics Interestingly, investor behaviour is also converging with Leo XIII’s ethics. Impact investing, faith-based investing, and ESG screening are no longer niche. According to the Global Sustainable Investment Review, global sustainable investment reached $35.3 trillion in 2020, accounting for more than a third of total assets under management. Faith-aligned investment groups, including Catholic institutions managing multi-billion-dollar endowments, increasingly exclude companies that violate labour rights, degrade ecosystems, or operate in high-conflict zones. Pope Leo’s social vision now directly influences capital flows. Export-import players hoping to attract institutional investors must demonstrate more than quarterly earnings—they must articulate how their operations align with justice, stewardship, and human dignity. These are not soft values; they are becoming capital differentiators. The Strategic Advantage of Moral Clarity It’s tempting to see ESG as a chore, an imposition from regulators and activist investors. But Leo XIII saw something deeper: that systems built without moral clarity eventually become unstable. Whether it’s collapsing supply chains during a pandemic, extreme weather disrupting logistics, or social unrest in response to inequality, businesses today are paying the price for ignoring the societal context in which they operate. For those in export-import—where interdependence, visibility, and velocity define competitive advantage—moral clarity is not just a compass. It’s a risk management tool. Embracing the social justice principles articulated by Pope Leo XIII is not about religious observance. It’s about recognising that every contract, every shipment, and every business decision takes place in a moral landscape. Companies that map that terrain wisely will build trust, attract capital, and sustain value in a turbulent century. Final Thought: The Long View Matters Pope Leo XIII understood that economic systems shape souls, not just markets. As ESG matures from a trend to a global standard, his insistence on dignity, justice, and moral economy becomes increasingly relevant. Businesses that embrace this long view—treating social responsibility as governance, not charity—will not only report better metrics. They’ll build more enduring, ethical, and ultimately profitable operations. Join Hi-Fella Today! As Pope Leo’s enduring emphasis on social justice gains renewed relevance in today’s ESG-driven business landscape, export-import companies must rise to the challenge of aligning profit with purpose. Hi-Fella supports this shift by connecting you with ethically aligned partners, offering transparency tools to enhance ESG reporting, and enabling responsible sourcing across global markets. Whether you're aiming to meet new governance standards or build a supply chain that reflects your values, Hi-Fella empowers you to trade responsibly while staying competitive in a world where ethics and economics go hand in hand.
Pope Leo’s Emphasis on Social Justice: Implications for Corporate Governance and ESG Reporting
Pope Leo XIII might not be the first name that comes to mind when thinking about supply chains, board...
Read More
UK Wildfires Highlight Climate Risks: What Businesses Should Consider
UK Wildfires Highlight Climate Risks: What Businesses Should Consider
Wildfires in the United Kingdom were once a statistical rarity, relegated to the heathlands and moorlands...
Philippines 2025 Elections: Implications for Foreign Investors and Trade Policies
Philippines 2025 Elections: Implications for Foreign Investors and Trade Policies
In May 2025, the Philippines will hold its midterm elections—a political event that may not grab global...